t;
on that point.
*Gernot Wagner, **New York University (on leave at Columbia Business
School, spring 2022)*
gwagner.com
*Keep in touch: *gwagner.com/#newsletter
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:58 PM wrote:
> I might agree with Lomborg that geoengineering research “might just prove
> to be Ea
To be clear, this effort goes quite a bit further. From the "extended
argument": "[…] it is *effective *and *enforceable *political control by
the Global South that would be required."
That, of course, renders basically any global (climate) governance effort
anywhere illegitim
This is a rather…odd jumble of information:
twitter.com/GernotWagner/status/1405908094224379907?s=19
Gernot Wagner, New York University
gwagner.com
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, 11:01 Geoeng Info wrote:
> https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org
>
> Geoengineering Map
>
> This intera
tell.
One strong vote to simply ignore.
Cheers,
G
*Gernot Wagner, **New York University*
gwagner.com
*Keep in touch: *gwagner.com/#newsletter
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 2:19 PM Hawkins, David wrote:
> The audience is not the people in the room. The audience is the people
> who will receiv
This is from...2015.
Gernot Wagner, New York University
gwagner.com
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 04:36 Andrew Lockley wrote:
>
> https://www.edf.org/climate/our-position-geoengineering
>
> Our position on geoengineering
> Based on our best understanding of the current scienc
This post should have mentioned prominently that some 1,100 of the
references came from Nils Matzner and Jesse Reynolds!
Entschuldigung, Nils! Verontschuldiging, Jesse!
Now fixed: https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/blog/zotero
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University**
gwagner.com
There's an entire 26-brief workshop volume where this came from:
https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/governance-deployment-solar-geoengineering
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University**
gwagner.com
**through June; **New York University thereafter*
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:52 AM Andrew
That sounds about right: reckless, radical, and woefully misinformed.
On Feb 1, 2018 5:25 PM, "Brian Cartwright"
wrote:
It's clear from Congressman Smith's endorsement of geoengineering that he
sees it as preferable to regulations that would reduce emissions. I would
And, sadly, the numbers of those believing this stuff aren't small:
nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0014-3
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University*
gwagner.com
*Climate Shock*
*, a Top 15 FT McKinsey Business Book of the Year 2015, now Austria’s
Natural Science Book of the Year 2017*climateshock.org
go to die.)
Cheers,
Gernot
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University*
gwagner.com
*Climate Shock*
*, a Top 15 FT McKinsey Business Book of the Year 2015, now Austria’s
Natural Science Book of the Year 2017*climateshock.org
<http://www.climateshock.org/>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Moreno-Cruz, Juan
2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fenvironment%2F2017%2Fmar%2F29%2Fcriticism-harvard-solar-geoengineering-research-distorted%3FCMP%3Dshare_btn_tw>
-
- View more sharing options
David W Keith and Gernot Wagner
Tuesday 28 March 2017 17.15 BST
Even if the world were to cut emissions to zero tomor
Indeed. For some context:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University*
gwagner.com
*Climate Shock*
*, a Top 15 FT McKinsey Business Book of the Year 2015, now also Austria’s
at
geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu. Please also refer to the page for a
full agenda.
Best,
Gernot
*Gernot Wagner, Harvard University*
gwagner.com
*Climate Shock*
*, a Top 15 FT McKinsey Business Book of the Year 2015, now also Austria’s
Natural Science Book of the Year 2017*climateshock.org
<h
13 matches
Mail list logo