> inadequately treated in conventional models. Isn't it those horizontal
>> pressure forces that power their biotic pump.
>>
>> At least in the context of the Amazon, I would like to see a back of the
>> envelope comparison of the pressure forces driven by condensati
Dr. Makarieva, list etal
Thanks for the added response. A few inserts below.
On Jul 6, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Anastassia Makarieva ammakari...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Ron (ccd all previous discussion participants)
Thank you for your questions. Please allow me a few words about my
Prof. Harte and ccs
Thanks for the new information. This is to turn this beetle kill
topic towards geoengineering, in part because I see you helped the authors on
the sent article. Also, others may not know that there is a “geo” side to this
beetle kill disaster.
The
Many fascinating eco-climatological issues are raised in these discussions, but
for now I just want to chime in on the forest infestation topic.
First, the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) problem in Colorado
is nearly certainly not the result of warmer winters, as commonly
Dear Ron
Thank you for your further comments. I admire your dedication to save the
Earth -- my own research is driven by the same aspiration. Indeed we appear
to disagree on quite a few things. The aim of my responses to your comments
below is not to (immediately) persuade you but rather to show
: *Anastassia Makarieva ammakari...@gmail.com
*Subject: **Re: [geo] Smart reforestation must go beyond carbon: expert |
CIFOR Forests News Blog*
*Date: *July 5, 2015 at 1:25:15 AM MDT
*To: *Ronal W. Larson rongretlar...@comcast.net
*Cc: *Geoengineering geoengineering@googlegroups.com, Douglas Sheil
(inland) also seems possibly impacted.
Thanks to both for the responses and the new information.
Ron
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Douglas Sheil douglas.sh...@nmbu.no
*Subject: **RE: [geo] Smart reforestation must go beyond carbon: expert |
CIFOR Forests News Blog*
*Date: *July 3
, so hope those proponents will also chime in.
More below.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Anastassia Makarieva ammakari...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [geo] Smart reforestation must go beyond carbon: expert | CIFOR
Forests News Blog
Date: July 5, 2015 at 1:25:15 AM MDT
To: Ronal W
List, especially Mike and John, cc Brian (who started this)
1. This is to explore further how this biotic pump topic would
influence any part of geoengineering. I have concluded, like Brian, that this
paper is important in promoting regrowth of forests. John certainly agrees and
Hi Ronal, Brian, John, et al.‹As a modeler, I would imagine the question is
just what is it that one would want added to the models. Quite a number of
skeptics want the models to add in long cycles evident in the
observations‹that would be fine in empirical models, but the whole idea of
physical
I'm not a climate modeler and my understanding of what goes in to conventional
physics process-based atmospheric models is very limited, so correct me if I am
wrong mike, but I was under the impression that it was the horizontal not the
vertical pressure gradients that M G think is
Sciences
ERG/ESPM
310 Barrows Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
jha...@berkeley.edu
On Jun 1, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Mike MacCracken mmacc...@comcast.net wrote:
Re: [geo] Smart reforestation must go beyond carbon: expert | CIFOR Forests
News Blog
Hi Ronal, Brian, John
must go beyond carbon: expert | CIFOR Forests
News Blog
Hi Ronal, Brian, John, et al.—As a modeler, I would imagine the question is
just what is it that one would want added to the models. Quite a number of
skeptics want the models to add in long cycles evident in the
observations
http://blog.cifor.org/28542/smart-reforestation-must-go-beyond-carbon-expert#.VWTKEoFwbqC
Smart reforestation must go beyond carbon: expert
18 MAY 2015
BY CATRIONA MOSS
1187011
Bee_bee_tree_(Tetradium)_seeds
A new study from CIFOR warns the reforestation solely for carbon storage
can have
14 matches
Mail list logo
