[geo] Decarbonizing the EU energy system by 2050: an important role for BECCS

Poster's note : old, but new to this list http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14693062.2016.1242058?needAccess=true=tcpo20 Decarbonizing the EU energy system by 2050: an important role for BECCS Baltazar Solano Rodriguez ,

Re: [geo] Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs

xx > On May 4, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Andrew Lockley wrote: > > > https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610 > > > Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon > Removal

[geo] Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential

Boysen, Lena R.; Lucht, Wolfgang; Gerten, Dieter (2017): Trade-offs for food production, nature conservation and climate limit the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential. In Glob Chang Biol. DOI: 10./gcb.13745.

[geo] Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs

https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/136610 Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs Johnson, Katelyn; Martin, Derek; Zhang, Xilin... [more] 2017 Abstract: In 2015, nearly

Re: [geo] Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs

This is quite a nice piece of work from masters students of my alma mater (UM's SNRE)! My concern, as usual, is that there is no discussion of cost-reduction pathways that take into account a sober and realistic prospectus of immanent technological change - in particular, the combined and

Re: [geo] Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs

Compare and contrast with this somewhat broader effort at evaluating climate interventions?:The Book | Drawdown || The Book | Drawdown | | Anyway, until there is real money spent on researching and testing these approaches (and not just recycling of existing, sparse data by

[geo] Re: Fwd: Hi - New Scientist press enquiry

The below paper would appear to be instructive on this debate ; it may not end as it begins LETTER • OPEN ACCESS • IOPSELECT Atmospheric consequences of disruption of the ocean thermocline Lester Kwiatkowski, Katharine L Ricke and

[geo] Trading long-term carbon dioxide removal futures would be 'reckless' - environmentalresearchweb

http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/news/68675 May 4, 2017 Trading long-term carbon dioxide removal futures would be 'reckless' Right now the technologies available for removing carbon dioxide, such as direct air capture or afforestation schemes, are expensive and often not fully