as 1958, atmospheric motions and turbulence would
rapidly degrade any hole made by weapon bursts.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=978
Oliver,
The reference is:
S Chapman, 1934, The gases of the atmosphere, Q J R Meteorol Soc, 60, 127-142.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=978
economically, but surely there’s more to the sea change than
just that. What, though? The evidence for man made warming via fossil fuels is
as clear as the ozone loss was in the period 1987 onwards, so it’s not the
scientific uncertainty.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dyn
Here’s an open access paper that casts light on the institutional dependence
and regional dependence of surface temperature variability in the CMIP5 climate
models.
http://www.tellusa.net/index.php/tellusa/article/view/23880
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dyn
the same
applies to the NH.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199236534
***
On 30 May 2015, at 00:
roll along just fine without us or
with our possibly chastened survivors for another 4.5 billion years, until it’s
fried to a crisp as the sun becomes a red giant.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-1
? Even an F-15 can’t out climb that
except by very special zoom and climb manoeuvres.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=978
beneath.
How does this relate to the often-repeated claims that Greenland ice melting
slowed after Mt. Pinatubo? I don’t know, but see above. My opinion is that
direct radiative effects from PSCs in the Arctic polar vortex are unlikely to
be large enough.
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULEN
ther references that provide direct
observational evidence of low nitrous oxide, methane and CFC mixing ratios
inside the vortex, and that aerosols entered the vortex at high altitudes from
mid latitudes - the 1995 QJRMS reference - with none from lower down?
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURB
I recommend this issue of EOS, for the article on pages 8-9:-
https://eos.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/12.1_magazine.pdf?6874e7
Adrian Tuck
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/cat
This may be of interest.
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2016/012516-rapid-affordable-energy-transformation-possible.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen
initially, and
it takes military scale budgets to deal with it, at least so far. It will be
interesting to see how Google, Facebook and other internet corporations react,
but they are interested in compact electronic equipment rather than
mass-to-altitude.
Adrian Tuck
a.t...@imperial.ac.uk
https
Here’s a new perspective on modelling the effects of solar radiation and
volcanoes:-
Earth Syst. Dynam., 7, 1–18, 2016 www.earth-syst-dynam.net/7/1/2016/
doi:10.5194/esd-7-1-2016
Adrian Tuck
a.t...@imperial.ac.uk
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atmospheric-turbulence-9780199236534?cc=gb
s.edu/~robock
> ☮ http://twitter.com/AlanRobock
> Watch my 18 min TEDx talk at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsrEk1oZ-54
>
> On 3/9/2016 2:18 AM, Adrian Tuck wrote:
>> Here’s a new perspective on modelling the effects of solar radiation and
>> volcanoes:-
>> Earth Syst
This paper seems relevant.
Adrian Tuck
a.t...@imperial.ac.uk
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atmospheric-turbulence-9780199236534?cc=gb&lang=en&;
Sulfur Dioxide Accelerates the Heterogeneous Oxidation Rate of Organic Aerosol
by Hydroxyl Radicals
Nicole K. Richards-Henderson,
Socrates he say “Entropy budget must accompany energy budget as well as dollar
budget”. Necessary for realism.
On 16 Mar 2016, at 12:24, Andrew Lockley wrote:
> http://www.centerforcarbonremoval.org/blog/2016/3/6/socratic-dialogue-on-direct-air-capture?utm_content=buffere1904&utm_medium=social&
Long on engineering and logistics, very short on science. That’s a potentially
dangerous combination. Chapter 11 for example, Risks, has exhaustive detail on
engineering, but zero on any scientific risks, which are multiple. It won’t do.
Adrian Tuck
a.t...@imperial.ac.uk
https://global.oup.com
, particularly
as regards the amount of drying it imposes on air entering the stratosphere.
While many expected the tropical tropopause to be elevated by more vigorous
convection from warmer underlying surfaces, the atmosphere in its wisdom may
have done something different.
Adrian
Adrian Tuck
More power to Jim’s arm. He has probably discovered the hard way that for a
scientist, publishing in a journal is much less expensive than going through
the legal system. I beg to differ that policy drove people like Rutherford,
Bohr, Einstein, Born, Heisenberg, Chadwick et al to pursue high ene
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Adrian Tuck
> Subject: Re: [geo] Climate Change Policy and The Super-Hero Syndrome: Boyd
> Date: 4 January 2017 10:12:00 GMT
> To: andrew.lock...@gmail.com
>
> Ah yes, the UN channels Michael Gove. I recommend the article in EOS, the AGU
&
That’ll come as a very small consolation to NOAA, see the link below. They’re
politicians, look at what they do, not what they say.
https://wpo.st/nM3f2
On 4 Mar 2017, at 18:27, Michael MacCracken wrote:
> On the Chairman's statement about likely effects, these are the claims of
> those suing E
The idea that we know enough by way of predictability to embark on this, when
models predict macro weather rather than climate, is inadvisable, to put it
mildly.
On 25 Mar 2017, at 05:10, Shinichiro ASAYAMA wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In association with this new Harvard solar geoengineering resea
Does geoengineering really want to be associated with Trump? It fulfils the
fears that many atmospheric scientists had in the wake of Crutzen’s paper, that
a climate denying politician would seize on it as a substitute for reducing
fossil fuel burning. The laws of nature cannot be repealed, unli
This paper seems relevant:
Radiative forcing from anthropogenic sulfur and organic emissions reaching the
stratosphere
By:Yu, PF (Yu, Pengfei)[ 1,2 ] ; Murphy, DM (Murphy, Daniel M.)[ 1 ] ;
Portmann, RW (Portmann, Robert W.)[ 1 ] ; Toon, OB (Toon, Owen B.)[ 3,4 ] ;
Froyd, KD (Froyd, Karl D.)[ 1,
This is unlikely but possible in real atmospheric aerosols. Formation as a
surface film has been observed experimentally over a decade ago, see below;
there is lab and theory evidence that lenses of fatty acid may form.
Explore this journal >
Previous article in issue: Vertical distribution of
, the
biosphere and human activity. ‘Harvesting’ that might be thermodynamically
counter productive.
Adrian Tuck
a.t...@imperial.ac.uk
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atmospheric-turbulence-9780199236534?cc=gb&lang=en&;
On 8 Feb 2018, at 17:37, Greg Rau wrote:
&g
Try this:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b03112?ref=jpcafhVI-vaida-articles
It’s open access. The problem is in defining the system, with the further
difficulty that
you cannot apply equilibrium thermodynamics to the the planet and its spatial
environment.
Adrian
On 12 Feb 2018,
As requested by Andrew.
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Andrew Lockley
> Subject: Re: [geo] Experiment idea
> Date: 2 November 2020 at 16:59:57 GMT-7
> To: Adrian Tuck
>
> Thanks. Can you repost to the list?
>
> Andrew
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 23:
Check “sunny greenland” + Richard S Scorer.
> On 6 Dec 2020, at 07:43, SALTER Stephen wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> The highest estimate for Greenland ice sheet loss is 325 billion tonnes a
> year.
>
> If I multiply this by the latent heat of fusion of ice and divide by the area
> of Greenland 2.
Not a new idea. Also, the reality is that cloud formation in the atmosphere
will always involve a chemically complex mixture: Murphy, Thomson &
Mahoney, Science, 282, 1664-1669 (1998) detected 46 different elements with
a single particle technique (Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry)
in a
At the suggestion of Andrew Lockley, I am forwarding this to the whole
group.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dr. Adrian Tuck
Date: 14 November 2013 05:58
Subject: Re: [geo] Sulphur injection regime - request for comments
To: Andrew Lockley
Cc: James Donaldson , Matt Hitchman <
It would be a mistake to believe that model calculations can offer reliable
simulations of the factors affecting the stratospheric water vapour
content. The requisite scales are not there, and there is still debate
about the detailed physical and chemical mechanisms at work.
On 18 February 2014 2
There's little new about the basic idea. Studies of Cb in the Bay of Bengal
in the 1960s made it clear that the cores of deep tropical thunderstorms
got up as high as 20 - 22 km, essentially unmixed from the marine boundary
layer. In 1994, the NASA ER-2 flew from Hawaii to Fiji en route to NZ at
2
Here is a link that shows a very useful Canadian approach to attributing
warming without the use of numerical models. It eliminates the possibility
of the present warming being caused by natural fluctuation. Also attached
is an op-ed piece based on the Climate Dynamics paper. There are competent,
r
Indeed. My opinion is that it is a phenomenon arising from the widespread
use of computers to produce forecasts via numerical process. Note the
tendency to refer to such simulations as 'experiments' in modelling papers.
On 7 June 2014 04:21, Ken Caldeira wrote:
> Whatever happened to the days w
It would be a good idea to get a grip on the complexities of physical
turbulence in the atmosphere and ocean first.
Adrian Tuck
ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective
Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4
On 10 June 2014 10:25, Andrew Lockley wrote
The attachment gives abstracts of three papers that show the complexity of
the mechanisms that result in stratospheric water vapor content, and also
the several chemical complexities of stratospheric aerosol chemistry.
Models are some way off being able to represent them quantitatively.
On 26 Jul
I wouldn't get too excited, wavelengths are in the vacuum UV, 101.5 to
107.2 nm, they don't even reach the stratosphere.
On 7 October 2014 00:07, Greg Rau wrote:
> Just to clarify, the "they" in the sentence below apparently refers to the
> CO2 molecules, not the researchers ;-)
> G
>
> --
eks to mimic the natural ocean processes of upwelling and downwelling. *
> ***
>
> * *
>
> *References (numbers refer to reference list in the following “Push-pull
> ocean pipes” Topic*
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
&g
It's more likely to be a power law than either linear or exponential, see:-
http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/sg/knowledge/isbn/item6817926/The-Weather-and-Climate:-Emergent-Laws-and-Multifractal-Cascades/?site_locale=en_SG
The abstract is available on the CUP link above, the book itself will be
available
climate. There
are obviously implications for the modelling of geoengineering.
http://www.cambridge.org/aus/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9781107018983
Adrian Tuck
***
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford Univ
rd.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=V26cEgdcC88NGpDMl@o&page=1&doc=1>
Author(s): Harris, NRP; Farman, JC; Fahey, DW
Source: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS Volume: 89 Issue: 21 Article
Number: 219801 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.219801 Published: NOV 18 200
ience. You should ask why this paper, given its potentially important
claims, has not appeared in these journals.
Adrian Tuck
On 31 May 2013 00:52, wrote:
> With all due respect Dr. Tuck, the earlier cosmic ray hypothesis was not a
> Theory but a hypothesis and if comprehensively debunk
THE LAWS OF SCIENCE CANNOT BE REPEALED - especially by politicians
On 21 April 2017 at 12:24, Eric Durbrow wrote:
>
>
> Here in the US we are having a March for Science tomorrow and March for
> the Climate on the 29th. Does anyone have a pithy eye-catching
> scientifically accurate slogan to hel
SCIENCE NOT PREJUDICE
It's gotta be short
On 21 April 2017 at 19:02, 'Maggie Zhou' via geoengineering <
geoengineering@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> SYSTEM CHANGE, NOT CLIMATE CHANGE
>
> when PROFITABILITY trumps RATIONALITY, EARTH = the TITANIC
>
>
> On Friday, April 21, 2017 8:28 PM, Eric Durbrow
oo wish it were not true.
>
>
>
> On 4/21/17 9:59 PM, Dr. Adrian Tuck wrote:
>
> SCIENCE NOT PREJUDICE
>
> It's gotta be short
>
> On 21 April 2017 at 19:02, 'Maggie Zhou' via geoengineering <
> geoengineering@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
A good one seen in Denver: A picture of the Globe with arrows pointing to
it and the legend "I'M WITH HER'
On 21 April 2017 at 19:02, 'Maggie Zhou' via geoengineering <
geoengineering@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> SYSTEM CHANGE, NOT CLIMATE CHANGE
>
> when PROFITABILITY trumps RATIONALITY, EARTH = t
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT AN ALTERNATE FACT
THE PLANET CARES NOT A RAP FOR POLITICS
THINK OF YOUR KIDS & GRANDKIDS
SCIENCE LAWS CANNOT BE REPEALED
A CHANT: HEY, HEY, HO, HO, ALTERNATE FACTS HAVE TO GO
IF YOU DENY IT, GEOPHYSICS WILL BITE YOUR ASS
On 29 April 2017 at 09:51, Eric Durbrow wrote:
>
https://undark.org/article/wilo-imagineers-of-war/
--Adrian Tuck
***
'ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective'.
Oxford University Press, 2008. ISBN 978-0-19-923653-4.
http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=978
Maybe, but we haven’t had the conceit that it was planned, or that we know
enough to titrate one or more pollutants against others.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Jan 2020, at 15:10, Hawkins, David wrote:
>
> Ummm, climate intervention is what we have been doing for about 250 years.
>
> Typed
50 matches
Mail list logo
