Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

Excellent, added you with "GeoServer Administrator" role allowing access to the docker repo above. Note the group docker repo https://repo.osgeo.org/#browse/browse:docker provides public access to the contents of the per project docker repositories. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 01:21,

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

Ok thanks I'll have a look. My osgeo id is "alpa" On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:30 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > I think I volunteer for osgeo id stuff, let me go and make sure you have > access > > It has been done before, but not by us - we can ask the gdal or postgis > group for pointers if we

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

I think I volunteer for osgeo id stuff, let me go and make sure you have access It has been done before, but not by us - we can ask the gdal or postgis group for pointers if we need to. It is a nexus repository if that helps (looks to be possible with maven

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

I am applying to get an osgeo id. I hope it doesn't take long. Do you know how to push docker images from the build server? Is this something we've already done before? Thank you On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 6:33 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > We setup an osgeo docker repository just for this activity:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

We setup an osgeo docker repository just for this activity: https://repo.osgeo.org/#browse/browse:geoserver-docker Let me know your osgeo id and I can set you up. The build server should already have access... -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 09:22, Alessandro Parma <

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

Hi Jody, Do you know if there's a docker repository I can push the Teamengine docker image to? I am using GeoSolutions docker hub organizational account ATM. Thanks, Alessandro On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:47 PM Jody Garnett

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

That is great news! And something we can highlight on our blog ... I know I promised to help setup a code sprint to actually pass the tests :P Jody On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 2:50 AM Alessandro Parma < alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi All, Jody, > > Just a quick status update > >

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP 176 - CITE Automation

Hi All, Jody, Just a quick status update We've almost done with the implementation of the CITE tests. We're testing the new jobs on the build server before sending over the final PR. I'll keep you posted. -- Regards, Alessandro Parma ==

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Thanks, that is indeed an epic PR. I will have a look after this release. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 00:26, Alessandro Parma < alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi Jody, > > Lorenzo is on leave this week. I know he submitted a PR >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Hi Jody, Lorenzo is on leave this week. I know he submitted a PR for this work and he is addressing some points brought up by Andrea during his review. Lorenzo will provide more information as he comes back next week. Regards, Alessandro On

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Lorenzo: Do you know when you will get back to this activity? I am planning out my A3 activities and would like to know if I can work towards passing cite tests. -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 08:18, Lorenzo Pini wrote: > Sure, > no problem. > > I found existing artifacts there and

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Sure, no problem. I found existing artifacts there and just reused the same location. Regards, Lorenzo Pini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Lorenzo Pini Software Engineer GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Some small feedback, as I went looking for test results. I noticed the jobs uploading to: https://repo.osgeo.org/repository/geotools-releases/org/opengis/cite/ets-wcs11/1.13/ets-wcs11-1.13-ctl.zip Can you use the geoserver-releases repo for this work? I would also be happy to make an

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

That is great, thank you for the update. While the other teams have setup osgeo docker facilities, you are the first to try from GeoServer. I would like to ensure you have sufficient access (via a PSC member) to manage next week. I am somewhat apprehensive, but looking forward to, seeing the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Dear Jody, I'm working on setting up the CITE tests automation. Here is a brief update on the current status: - The required "ets-*" artifacts are being built on Jenkins. The deploy phase is currently missing, but it is not blocking as we only have a single server at the moment. - The

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Alessandro: We now have repo.osgeo.org operational, the builds should hopefully switch over in the next couple of days. I have created https://repo.osgeo.org/repository/geoserver-docker/ for you to try out. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 09:48, Jody Garnett wrote: > For repo, would

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

For repo, would having an osgeo nexus repo help as a place to store the docker images? -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 01:41, Alessandro Parma < alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Thanks for your feedback > > My answers inline below > > > I think managing the docker builds in the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Thanks for your feedback My answers inline below > I think managing the docker builds in the "build" directory is appropriate. Is it worth co-locating these with their cite data directory configuration (to make each folder more self contained)? I agree. I would move the datadirs everything in

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:28 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Thank you for the update! > > I think managing the docker builds in the "build" directory is > appropriate. Is it worth co-locating these with their cite data directory > configuration (to make each folder more self contained)? > Seems like

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Thank you for the update! I think managing the docker builds in the "build" directory is appropriate. Is it worth co-locating these with their cite data directory configuration (to make each folder more self contained)? aside: In the past when faced with builds grabbing status codes we would

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

HI Jody, All, Status update with a couple of questions about the source code management and deployment of this work: I added more builds for the ets suites, updated list: - wms11 - wms13 - wfs10 - wfs11 - wcs10 - wcs11 - wcs20 - wfs20 Then

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Dear Jody, All Just a quick update on this: I set up a test build on the build server for one of the CITE tests to build and deploy the artifacts on the maven repository

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Thanks, we may need to circle around build.geoserver.org plans. On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:42 PM Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi Jody, > We are a little beyond schedule with this, the work has started but there > is little to show. > > We will send periodic

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Hi Jody, We are a little beyond schedule with this, the work has started but there is little to show. We will send periodic updates to the psc and devel list starting next week. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation update?

Simone: Next week's Feb 18th meeting is our final meeting in February, is there any update from the Cite Automation work? With the recent news from Planet Federal I am concerned about ability to deliver into build.geoserver.org environment. -- Jody Garnett

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

We noted some ideas in the meeting, such as reaching out to prior sponsors, placing text on the home page. This is a weekend/evening activity for me and hard to chase. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 06:50, Ilya Rosenfeld wrote: > Are there any concrete ideas about how to securing the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

Are there any concrete ideas about how to securing the remaining funds? On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:51 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks, with that the GSIP is now passed. > > I give us until the end of October to raise enough money for the activity > to go ahead in 2019. > -- > Jody Garnett > > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

Thanks, with that the GSIP is now passed. I give us until the end of October to raise enough money for the activity to go ahead in 2019. -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 00:16, Kevin Smith wrote: > +1 > On 2019-10-02 10:03 a.m., Jody Garnett wrote: > > Kevin, Alessio please respond? > --

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

+1 On 2019-10-02 10:03 a.m., Jody Garnett wrote: > Kevin, Alessio please respond? > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 08:37, Simone Giannecchini > > wrote: > > +0 > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

+0 Il giorno mer 2 ott 2019 alle ore 19:03 Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Kevin, Alessio please respond? > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 08:37, Simone Giannecchini < > simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> +0 >> >> Regards, >> Simone Giannecchini >> == >> GeoServer

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

Kevin, Alessio please respond? -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 08:37, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > +0 > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information.

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

+0 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

+1 Cheers Andrea On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:10 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Follow up to chat with Torben, Jukka, Gabriel on GSIP 176 CITE Automation > RFP in today's > meeting. > > As a large portion of our 'budget' for this activity is based

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

+1 Ian On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 19:08, Jody Garnett wrote: > Follow up to chat with Torben, Jukka, Gabriel on GSIP 176 CITE Automation > RFP in today's > meeting. > > As a large portion of our 'budget' for this activity is based on OSGeo >

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 Cite Automation RFP

Follow up to chat with Torben, Jukka, Gabriel on GSIP 176 CITE Automation RFP in today's meeting. As a large portion of our 'budget' for this activity is based on OSGeo 2019 budget allocation I feel we need to wrap up fundraising by end of

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

I added one sentence to separate out "running the tests" from "formal certification", and added a graph to show current funding progress. Please check and publish when ready. I don't want to hit publish myself on the off chance it shows up as published in my name, and I think this will have more

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

I have thought a bit about hosting a reference implementation, if we just host the server in read-only mode - all that is needed is a machine (which OSGeo has offered to provide). If we host WFS-T (say to pass CITE tests) we would also need the ability to reset the dataset after a test run. I was

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Jody - I’ve updated the copy to take emphasis off “reference implementation” aspect of the message. Please let me know if the updated version suits. Also curious- assuming that this initiative succeeded, what impediment is there to host a reference implementation server? - Ilya Sent from my

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Checking now. I think we may need a stronger opening, the first sentence is not true: | GeoServer has long been a reference implementation of core OGC Standards: WMS, WFS, and WCS. Although GeoServer appears on the wiki page we do not qualify as a reference implementation: a) we have not

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Thanks Jody.. duly noted. Here’s the blog post draft: http://blog.geoserver.org/?p=3055=true Please feel free to chime in / throw stones. Not sure who hits “publish” but the content is complete on my end. Cheers, Ilya Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 16, 2019, at 2:43 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

I set a couple targets on the GSIP-176, however they are only a wild-guess (as we would still need anyone to respond to an RFP call). I have updated the GSIP page to make the target/progress more clear: - baseline: 5000 budget from osgeo - target 1: 1 funding raising - target 2: 15000

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Thanks, Jody. I’m curious, under ideal circumstances, what budget is required to get it fully under control and implemented? In other words if we were to set a fundraising target, what would be a solid number? Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 15, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Thanks for your hustle on this Ilya, adding you the blog.geoserver.org now. While we did mention this challenge during the state of geoserver presentation we did not linger on the fundraising aspect. -- Jody Garnett On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 12:09, Ilya Rosenfeld wrote: > Greetings - > > As some

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176

Greetings - As some of you probably know, I took it upon myself to raise awareness and try to drum up some funding for the CITE testing automation initiative on LinkedIn . It was gratifying to see all

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- Lähettäjä: Jody Garnett Lähetetty: maanantai 19. elokuuta 2019 20.20 Vastaanottaja: GeoServer Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP I believe I have addressed all the feedback form July, I would like this proposal approved before foss4g next week

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

+1 Alessio Il giorno mar 20 ago 2019 alle ore 08:33 Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > +1 > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 PM Simone Giannecchini < > simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Simone Giannecchini >> == >>

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

+1 Cheers Andrea On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 PM Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. > == > Ing. Simone

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

+1 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

I believe I have addressed all the feedback form July, I would like this proposal approved before foss4g next week in order to promote the fundraising aspect. * GSIP 176 CITE Automation RFP Response: - Alessio Fabiani: - Andrea Aime:

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Brad you asked online about the 10k budget limit, I have changed it to a range between 10k and 20k, and updated the section on sponsoring. If the proposal is now acceptable to you please vote :) -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 23:19, Jody Garnett wrote: > With no feedback incoming, I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

I have updated the proposal to make it very clear that the tests are not expected to run (in both the requirements and clarification section). If the proposal is now acceptable to you please vote! -- Jody Garnett On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 03:11, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > thanks, that looks

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

I have added this requirement. If the proposal is now acceptable please vote :) -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 10:32, Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@federal.planet.com> wrote: > I would also love to have a private repo for Jenkins config, I've been > collecting a whole lot of it. > > I

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Hi Jody, thanks, that looks much better. I'd add a clarification, that the setup of the tests should allow them to run, but does not require them to pass. Now, it should be evident in that you are setting up a second phase, code sprint, to make the tests pass, however, it's just there at the

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

That line sounds fine, please capitalize REQUIRED, to match the rest :) I had a couple more inquires about supporting this activity offline, and have worked with the osgeo treasurer to add: * GSIP-176 now has cut and paste email to send to

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

I would also love to have a private repo for Jenkins config, I've been collecting a whole lot of it. I could add a requirement line along the lines of "Delivery is required to include the system prerequisites and environment setup in the form of a bash script executable on Ubuntu 18" Does that

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Sounds good, still would like a private repo to store Jenkins configuration (including that 10-lin bash script). Thanks for the response Torben, do you need to modify the note I put in there about deliverable requirements? -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 16:12, Torben Barsballe <

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Follow-up: On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 2:49 PM Torben Barsballe < tbarsba...@federal.planet.com> wrote: > Some comments on the Planet portion: > > It's also not clear what relationship should be setup with Planet, if >> someone that's not >> Planet wants to bid, what is the context? Planet is going

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Some comments on the Planet portion: It's also not clear what relationship should be setup with Planet, if > someone that's not > Planet wants to bid, what is the context? Planet is going to offer a set > amount of time > to help with setting up things in their locked down node execution >

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Okay I have revised the page based on your feedback, with a section for applications, requirements and discussion. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 02:03, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I don't think it's possible to vote right now

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Hi Jody, I don't think it's possible to vote right now as the proposal lack clarity and focus. The page does not include what kind of approach should be used to automate the tests and links to some approaches that are years old, having no reality check against what the CITE engine does and how it

Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

With no feedback incoming, I would like to ask the PSC to vote on this proposal. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 14:20, Jody Garnett wrote: > Proposal GSIP-176 > ready for review. > -- > Jody Garnett >

[Geoserver-devel] GSIP-176 CITE Test Automation RFP

Proposal GSIP-176 ready for review. -- Jody Garnett ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel