Doh, works fine in Chrome but Firefox complains.
Try with this one maybe?
https://drive.google.com/u/0/uc?id=16c4etMcgUJPST8GIduzYJnB_Lw6N0HJG=download
Cheers
Andrea
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 1:18 AM Jody Garnett wrote:
> The video demo did not work me; but I appreciate the effort!
> --
> Jody
+1
-Jukka Rahkonen-
Lähettäjä: Andrea Aime
Lähetetty: perjantai 14. tammikuuta 2022 20.01
Vastaanottaja: GeoServer
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 207, feature type info customization
Aand PR here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/5587
(with a small demo video)
Cheers
Andrea
The video demo did not work me; but I appreciate the effort!
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 10:04, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Aand PR here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/5587
> (with a small demo video)
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM Andrea
Aand PR here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/5587
(with a small demo video)
Cheers
Andrea
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> please read and discuss GSIP 207, proposing to make the feature type
> attribute
Great, thank you for the clarification, +1.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:02 PM Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:57 PM Nuno Oliveira <
> nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, Andrea,
>> looks good to me, just a couple of comments:
+1 here
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 3:06 PM Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:57 PM Nuno Oliveira <
> nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, Andrea,
>> looks good to me, just a couple of comments:
>>
>>- Is the identifier (ID
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:57 PM Nuno Oliveira <
nuno.olive...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi all, Andrea,
> looks good to me, just a couple of comments:
>
>- Is the identifier (ID attribute) of the feature type fixed? I'm
>assuming it is.
>
>
Yes, it is.
>- If we define a new
Hi all, Andrea,
looks good to me, just a couple of comments:
- Is the identifier (ID attribute) of the feature type fixed? I'm
assuming it is.
- If we define a new attribute that uses a complex CQL expression (for
example a concatenation) I'm assuming that someone can send a filter
Based on your feedback, I've got no further concerns, so +1 from me.
Per-item comments inline below:
>>- What does the "reset" button do? I assume it resets to native
>> values?
>>
>>
> Yep, bring the editable table back to match the native values. Would you
> like to suggest a better
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:52 PM Rahkonen Jukka (MML) <
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> +1, much easier than to play with schema.xsd and offers more features,
> especially for non-SQL data sources when a database view is not an option.
>
Yes, that's the main target.
>
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 12:24 AM Torben Barsballe
wrote:
> This definitely looks like a useful improvement.
>
> I do have some minor questions:
>
>1. There's a couple of UI elements in Proposal > GUI who's
>behavior isn't really explained:
>
> As you might have noticed, the proposal has
This definitely looks like a useful improvement.
I do have some minor questions:
1. There's a couple of UI elements in Proposal > GUI who's
behavior isn't really explained:
- What happens if you uncheck "Customize feature type", then later
re-check it? Will any customizations
Hi Jody,
as the proposal suggests, the mapping happens above the data sources, while
SQL views
are handled inside JDBCDataStore. So no, it won't allow what you're
describing, it has to
happen somewhere inside JDBCDataStore/GeoPkgDialect.
Cheers
Andrea
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:21 AM Jody Garnett
Thanks Andrea!
GeoServer 1.x had some very simple ability to “override” attribute
information, it is nice to see that improved on. I wonder if this would
allow geopackage to force the geometry of an SQLView from BigDecimal to
Geometry.
I will read this more carefully tomorrow.
Jody
On Wed, Dec
-
Lähettäjä: Ian Turton
Lähetetty: keskiviikko 22. joulukuuta 2021 15.21
Vastaanottaja: Andrea Aime
Kopio: GeoServer
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] GSIP 207, feature type info customization
All sounds good to me, only question that occurs to me is about the filter does
this apply to the data coming
Great, thanks! Makes sense that way.
Ian
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, 13:25 Andrea Aime,
wrote:
> Addressed in the "interactions" section:
>
> "With the feature type own filter attribute, which is also going to work
> on top of the mapping"
>
> See more at
>
Addressed in the "interactions" section:
"With the feature type own filter attribute, which is also going to work on
top of the mapping"
See more at
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-207#interactions
This is consistent with other forms of mapping, like app-schema, or
All sounds good to me, only question that occurs to me is about the filter
does this apply to the data coming from the datastore as now or the new
data?
Ian
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, 11:04 Andrea Aime,
wrote:
> Hi all,
> please read and discuss GSIP 207, proposing to make the feature type
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
