UNCLASSIFIED
Thanks for your help Ben and Andrea.
I guess the null namespace issue is a bit of a moot point anyway given that the
WFS should not be serving features when the store is disabled.
We'll take your advice Ben about monitoring and re-enable the datastore via the
REST API if indeed the
Hi,
I am newly set up Image Mosaic Store/Layer on Geoserver and trying to make it
work.
And I can get images from Image Mosaic, but have an issue which is image
reprojection is not working.
Image appears in designated location on the map correctly, but it is just flat
image, not reprojected.
It
You might be able to use Rendering Transformations to do this:
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/styling/sld/extensions/rendering-transform.html
But it will take a bit of code...
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Volkan Gümüs wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm looking for a way to overlay
Hi Andrea,
Thanks for your help. I also found the log in GeoWebCache and did a comparison
with non populated tile cache :-).
I thought I would double check by asking the list to cover all the bases - in
case it's used elsewhere.
Thanks again.
Cheers
Rini
F
Hello everybody!
I'm looking for a way to overlay my WMS layer with a layer that is
binned through hexagons. I'd like to set an edge length (let's say
300meters) and receive hexagons for the whole map.
Is there a way to get this kind of hexagon layer without the need to
create previously all h
Thinks, but this was only a small typo, it doesn't make a difference, the shift
is larger.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hards [mailto:br...@frogmouth.net]
Sent: woensdag 12 oktober 2016 12:40
To: Bart Verbeeck ; geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Geoserver-users] EPSG:43
Perhaps because the BBOX is not the same.
In the first: 50.94258788037
In the second: 50.942587880378
Brad
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://s
Dear list
Why is there a small shift in the produced images?
1. EPSG:4326
2. CRS:84
BBOX is the same (but X/Y reversed of course)
http://geoservices.beta.informatievlaanderen.be/raadpleegdiensten/GRB/wms?LAYERS=GRB_BSK&EXCEPTIONS=XML&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&
Dear list
Why is there a small shift in the produced images?
1. EPSG:4326
2. CRS:84
BBOX is the same (but X/Y reversed of course)
http://geoservices.beta.informatievlaanderen.be/raadpleegdiensten/GRB/wms?LAYERS=GRB_BSK&EXCEPTIONS=XML&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WM
Sorry for eventual double posting
Dear list
Why is there a small shift in the produced images?
1. EPSG:4326
2. CRS:84
BBOX is the same (but X/Y reversed of course)
http://geoservices.beta.informatievlaanderen.be/raadpleegdiensten/GRB/wms?LAYERS=GRB_BSK&EXCEPTIONS=XML&FORMAT=image%2Fpng&TRANSPA
Hi all,
I'm migrating a bunch of our services and data to GeoServer (2.8.4,
Windows).
We have a quite large raster store here. It consists of some hundreds of
thousands of TIFF files with their accompanying TFW worldfile.
They are all in the same projection.
I thought it would be easy to config
Hi Jason,
thanks for your hint. Untfortunately it is not the solution of the problem. I checked the indexer.properties file, caching is already set to false.
Sabine
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 um 14:44 Uhr
Von: "Jason Newmoyer"
An: "P O'Toole"
Cc: "Sabine Ohlendorf" , "geoserver-
Hi Rini,
that log is actually from GeoWebCache, so a proper performance comparison
should be done
by hitting a non yet populated tile cache and force GWC to popupate it...
like a seeding operation
for example.
That said, the JAI "crop" operation is actually doing nothing, it's just
making the imag
13 matches
Mail list logo