Hi,
The VT process does remove very small (<1 pixel) features from the results.
There were some other people who noticed that you might need to create your
own tileset definition in GWC if you are using MB clients (otherwise your
tiles will appear to be "too generalized"). I think they
gt; Thanks,
>
> On 31/07/17 23:02, Dave Blasby wrote:
>
> Hi, Dylan,
>
> Did it work for you?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Dave Blasby <dbla...@boundlessgeo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Dylan,
>>
>> I had some
excellent! Thanks :) Will it be the nightly build I'll need to try,
> or is there another way of getting the updated extension?
>
> On 27/07/17 20:10, Dave Blasby wrote:
>
> Hi, Dylan,
>
> I tracked the problem down to an issue in the VT rendering. If no SLD
> rules apply (as
with. The real issues arise when using polygon data---serving
> as VectorTile with the SLD took a whopping 5.5 seconds to generate a
> completely empty tile, but if I turned off the SLD it only took 0.3 seconds!
>
> In reality I'm using TMS combined with GWC, so I'd only see these times
&
Hi, Dylan,
The VT renderer should be taking the min/max scale range into consideration
when querying the underlying data.
Do you have access to a dev environment? If you do, please look
in VectorTileMapOutputFormat#produceMap(). About half way down, you should
see;
Query query =
> this means that for using vector tiles with GWC in the best conditions
> meta
> tiling should deactivated (set to 1x1) ?
>
>
> On 07/18/2017 06:13 PM, Dave Blasby wrote:
>
> Hi, Ben,
>
> Metatiling doesn't work with Vector Tiles. Metatiling, basically, has the
&g
Hi, Ben,
Metatiling doesn't work with Vector Tiles. Metatiling, basically, has the
WMS create an image 4* (in both directions) as large and then GWC breaks it
into 16 smaller images. This helps with labelling.
You cannot (easily) cut up vector tiles, so you cannot do this with vector
tiles
Hi, Tom,
Most people are asking for larger gutters around the tiles! You can set it
the size in the code, but there isn't an easy way to change it...
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/extension/vectortiles/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wms/vector/PipelineBuilder.java#L80
I'm
Hi, Ben,
It's unlikely the VectorTiles renderer pays attention to extra CQL filters
in the WMS request; the VT renderer is very simple. However, the
functionality would likely be easy to add - just "and" the filter to the
filter being sent to the datastore.
Thanks,
Dave
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at
Hi,
Mapbox vector format is in integer-ized pixel coordinates, so doing more
than that wouldn't affect the output.
For the other formats (i.e. geojson), you can use the overSamplingFactor so
it gets better resolution.
If you need to change these, you're probably requesting tiles at the wrong
Hi,
What happens when you directly request the data from WMS (in geojson format)?
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Edward Mac Gillavry
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We're currently creating a setup using the Vector tile plugin [1]. Using
> the Gmaps enpoint of GWC,
11 matches
Mail list logo