Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the status of the release. Are we all ready to go? I think that
> Richard usually volunteers up his time to do the release? I know that he
> is kind of busy this week so I can volunteer on this one.
>
In this weeks meeting we discussed the show st
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 16:19 +0200, Jody Garnett wrote:
> We still have some showstoppers on the geotools 2.2 release ...
>
> - need javadocs figured out, but martin is away so perhaps someone
> else will have to post (unless rgould knows the magic)
This should be fixed in svn. However, the perso
I'm looking at being done this week.
Jesse
On 26-Jul-06, at 2:57 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
> timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
>
> I would prefer to have this in the next minor version, 2.2.1.
The same here!!On 7/26/06, Saul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,I've successfully built an up-to-date geotools-2.2.x branch (currentlyRC5). Maven is very cool.I've also successfully built an up-to-date geoserver trunk.I then went to deploy my geoserver war file, and got the following
exc
Hi all,
I'm looking for GML 2 documents to test with. If I could get a dozen
or so different documents (documents not produced by
geoserver ;-) ). That would be great.
Jesse
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Fut
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/27/2006 10:20:19
AM:
> How about Tuesday 01/08/06 at 19.00 UTC?
>
High noon? You bet!
Bryce
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and yo
How about Tuesday 01/08/06 at 19.00 UTC?
-Original Message-
From: Simone Giannecchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2006 17:14
To: Adit Santokhee
Cc: Bryce L Nordgren; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Geoserver-devel;
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Geoto
Cool, send out an email proposing day and time when you feel
comfortable about it.
Simone.
On 7/27/06, Adit Santokhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe next week will be better. I will have some time to hack into GeoServer
> as well :~))
>
> Adit.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon
Maybe next week will be better. I will have some time to hack into GeoServer
as well :~))
Adit.
-Original Message-
From: Simone Giannecchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2006 17:08
To: Adit Santokhee
Cc: Bryce L Nordgren; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Geoserver-devel;
geotools-devel@li
Well, I am UTC+2, tomorrow I am going to be availaible between 1200UTC
and 16:30 UTC, otherwise we can reschedule for next week during
official meeting time.
SImone.
On 7/27/06, Adit Santokhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Simone,
>
> This is a very idea. However, this is my first participat
Hello Simone,
This is a very idea. However, this is my first participation.
So could we agree on a time plz.
Cheers,
Adit
-Original Message-
From: Simone Giannecchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2006 16:55
To: Adit Santokhee
Cc: Bryce L Nordgren; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Geo
Ciao Adit,
would you be able to do an informat IRC tomorrow afternoon (our time
zones are very close to each other) on the geoserver channel?
That would cut help the discussion even because some people (like me)
are somehow slow to answer emails. Whoever is interested might show up
and provide com
Hello all,
We developed a Web Service application called GADS:
http://www.resc.rdg.ac.uk/twiki/bin/view/Resc/GridAccessDataService
It basically provides a simple interface for downloading gridded geospatial
data. However, GADS does not depend on any specification, hence the plan to
make it WCS c
Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/27/2006 08:42:27
AM:
However it does deviate from what "your" objectives are. But do you think
this is a viable possibility.
I think your approach differs substantially from our approach in
implementation details. However, I think we
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
> timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
>
We still have some showstoppers on the geotools 2.2 release ... I tried
to mention them earlier but I did not see it make the list -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/27/2006 08:42:27
AM:
>
> However it does deviate from what "your" objectives are. But do you think
> this is a viable possibility.
>
I think your approach differs substantially from our approach in
implementation details. However, I think we both need a common int
Hello Simone,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
In the meantime, I have been looking at GeoServer and GeoTools over last few
days with the aim of extending the current WCS branch of GeoServer to handle
4D data from CF NetCDF files, in a limited timeframe.
This will possibly involve changing the str
Ciao Adit,
I took a look at the project you are working and it seems pretty
interesting, moreover it fits with what are the objectives of the WCS
work we are trying to carry out on the GeoServer.
As of the GeoServer custom version that we are about to release, focus
was on efficiently managing two
Hi Jesse,
Do you have a timeline for the work. There are a few other project
timelines waiting for this release of GeoServer.
I would prefer to have this in the next minor version, 2.2.1. We could
also release GeoServer 1.4.1 at the same time containing the wfs
patches. Does anyone else have a
Filter CompareFilter not null safe
--
Key: GEOT-901
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-901
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core filter
Affects Versions: 2.2-RC3
R
20 matches
Mail list logo
