Hi,
I've made a few fixes to the mysql build and now we have a green online
build going.
So... next step? One more database? Or do we start having it report on th
devel list
on failures?
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more inf
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> It looks like Travis is using Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS and is affected by the
>> same bug as on Debian wheezy (see Jira for my workaround):
>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4733
>
>
> Interesting, was not aware... going to try that out, we
On 16/03/15 10:48, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
> wrote:
>> On 16/03/15 08:55, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> * GeoTools is a stand alone project, demanding people that are not
>>> interested in GeoServer to also build GeoServer is wrong
>> But projects that ca
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> On 16/03/15 08:55, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> * GeoTools is a stand alone project, demanding people that are not
>> interested in GeoServer to also build GeoServer is wrong
>>
>
> But projects that care about their users should at least k
On 16/03/15 08:55, Andrea Aime wrote:
> * GeoTools is a stand alone project, demanding people that are not
> interested in GeoServer to also build GeoServer is wrong
But projects that care about their users should at least keep an eye on
known downstream builds and fix failures with alacrity. Esp
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> I have not seen an app-schema failure for a couple of months. I am happy
> to advise Torben and Jody on setting up app-schema online tests (see link
> on the GS list); I think Jody has already suggested that Boundless may be
> able to h
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> The main problem is in my view the one you have already identified:
> submitters not running tests. And Travis being broken and ignored. And
> GeoTools developers not building GeoServer after changing GeoTools.
>
> If you really want to
On 16/03/15 07:21, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
> wrote:
>> No, all the app-schema online tests are in GeoServer app-schema-test and
>> require additional test fixtures. There are AFAIK no app-schema online
>> tests in GeoTools.
> So, there is no way for
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> No, all the app-schema online tests are in GeoServer app-schema-test and
> require additional test fixtures. There are AFAIK no app-schema online
> tests in GeoTools.
>
>
So, there is no way for us to get quick feedback about these fail
No, all the app-schema online tests are in GeoServer app-schema-test and
require additional test fixtures. There are AFAIK no app-schema online
tests in GeoTools.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 16/03/15 05:50, Andrea Aime wrote:
> The build is running with -Ponline, does that mean we are also running so
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Jody Garnett
wrote:
> I think you are doing the coordination right now on this email thread (
> the tasks section of the proposal is also good).
>
> I like your idea to make a general matrix testing master - add that to the
> tasks section of the proposal and stic
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've checked the online build and it seems postgis is now passing just
> fine (it's failing on mysql)...
> yet, we did not upgrade the jdbc driver yet, haven' we?
>
> Maybe the postgres/postgis version is old, so we are not getting bitte
Hi,
I've checked the online build and it seems postgis is now passing just fine
(it's failing on mysql)...
yet, we did not upgrade the jdbc driver yet, haven' we?
Maybe the postgres/postgis version is old, so we are not getting bitten
by the LOB test failure?
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Profe
So what specifically do you want to deprecate. Reply to the email or send a
pull request, need to deprecate now to be in position to remove later.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:21 AM Simone Giannecchini <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Ciao Jody,
> that would be _great_.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi,
the spectacular amound of reverts just performed by Ben make me think we
are doing something wrong
in terms of QA of pull requests, and that we need to make it less time
consuming and more predictable.
The first problem I see is that we cannot trust the Travis build result
because it always fa
Hello Andrea,
hoping I made it correctly: sync'ed with gt master, checked-in my latest
into my master, created a pull request on git hub.
My comments:
- I warned that I'm no git master myself, so bear with me if I got
something wrong (in fact, I've already "wasted" way too much time trying to
l
16 matches
Mail list logo
