Re: [Geotools-devel] app-schema numberMatched regression

2022-09-14 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
width= <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> Privo di virus.www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:19 AM Nie

[Geotools-devel] app-schema numberMatched regression

2022-09-12 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Hello everyone, I found a bug in app-schema that was recently introduced by https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-7214, a patch by Marco Volpini, but I am a bit confused about the changes and would like to know to what extent they are intentional. Bug logged at:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Ignored netcdf test - intended?

2022-04-04 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
.. Cheers Andrea On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 2:42 PM Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel wrote: Hello Brad, I do not recall why the test was ignored. It actually seems to work when I try so I wouldn't personally remove it. I have to say I don't remember much about this modul

Re: [Geotools-devel] Ignored netcdf test - intended?

2022-04-02 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Hello Brad, I do not recall why the test was ignored. It actually seems to work when I try so I wouldn't personally remove it. I have to say I don't remember much about this module any more, and I do not use it. Since it is a plugin I suppose someone is maintaining it? Kind Regards Niels

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] reprojections and multiple geometries

2021-10-17 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
iels On 1/10/2021 09:43, Andrea Aime wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:05 PM Niels Charlier <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hello Andrea, I did not mean to misrepresent you. I actually thought your suggestion made sense. The new method in the CRS class is (curre

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] reprojections and multiple geometries

2021-10-11 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:21 PM Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel <mailto:geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: 2) allow reprojection 3D->2D and only prevent 2D->3D reprojection (Andrea's suggestion). Before this gets out of hand, my suggestion is limited to the CRS

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] reprojections and multiple geometries

2021-10-11 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
easonable for the users but I wish you a good luck. -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel Lähetetty: lauantai 9. lokakuuta 2021 15.05 Vastaanottaja: Geotools-Devel list ; Geoserver-devel Aihe: [Geoserver-devel] reprojections and multiple geometries

[Geotools-devel] reprojections and multiple geometries

2021-10-09 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Hello Everyone, I am sending this email to both geotools and geoserver lists because the matter concerns both. I recently made a PR to improve geotools/geoserver behaviour with respect to multiple geometries that have different CRS. (https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3642) One of

[Geotools-devel] Fwd: [Geoserver-devel] powermock for unit tests in app-schema

2021-03-08 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
I guess I sent this to the wrong ML Forwarded Message Subject:[Geoserver-devel] powermock for unit tests in app-schema Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:01:23 +0100 From: Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel Reply-To: Niels Charlier To: Geoserver-devel Hello

Re: [Geotools-devel] mapbox vector tiles

2020-09-03 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Aime wrote: I must have imagined this one: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/unsupported/mbtiles/src/main/java/org/geotools/mbtiles/MBTilesDataStore.java Cheers Andrea On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:38 PM Niels Charlier <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: An mbtiles

Re: [Geotools-devel] mapbox vector tiles

2020-09-03 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Niels Charlier <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Andrea, Confusingly, mbtiles and mapbox vector tiles are two entirely distinct formats, as I understand it. Mapbox vector tiles are unrelated to sqlite. https://github.com/mapbox/vector-tile-spec Regards Niels

Re: [Geotools-devel] mapbox vector tiles

2020-09-03 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
vector tiles stored in a sqlite database. For map rendering usage only, don't try to use that thing for WFS, won't be pretty :-D Cheers Andrea On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:14 PM Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel <mailto:geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: Hello, Is i

[Geotools-devel] mapbox vector tiles

2020-09-03 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
Hello, Is it correct that there is currently no possibility to read mapbox binary vector tiles with geotools (PBF files). There is a mapbox style parser, but I don't see anything there that can be done with PBF sources specified inside it. Geoserver has MB vector tiles output format (an

Re: [Geotools-devel] Is there a reason we do not have an ECQL null literal?

2020-05-15 Thread Niels Charlier via GeoTools-Devel
There is "Expression/NIL". But it is not a literal, it's a property :/ A pseudo-property I'd say. See org.geotools.filter.expression.NullPropertyAccessorFactory It definitely has uses, it's used in both app-schema and CSW mappings. A literal would be more appropriate. Regards Niels On

Re: [Geotools-devel] unsupported kml datastore, no profile available

2020-02-09 Thread Niels Charlier
. Kind Regards Niels On 09/02/2020 14:24, Jody Garnett wrote: Your name is on the work, so I am asking you :) On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 2:20 PM Niels Charlier <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: I don't mind personally but Ian's recent fixes/improvements seems to suggest he or someone

Re: [Geotools-devel] unsupported kml datastore, no profile available

2020-02-09 Thread Niels Charlier
I don't mind personally but Ian's recent fixes/improvements seems to suggest he or someone is using it. Kind Regards Niels On 09/02/2020 13:02, Jody Garnett wrote: I have been arguing with IntiliJ and the geotools build for a bit this afternoon, one thing I noticed was your KML DataStore

Re: [Geotools-devel] filter function "not"

2019-05-01 Thread Niels Charlier
/ECQL-Parser-Design_110493908.html We already have some special cases to recognize odd patterns (and encode odd patterns) for ECQL constructs like "property IN (1,2,3)" which is mapped to filter "in(1,2,3) == TRUE" -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 14:59, Niels

Re: [Geotools-devel] filter function "not"

2019-04-30 Thread Niels Charlier
/04/2019 17:31, Andrea Aime wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:25 AM Niels Charlier <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hello, I discovered that the implemented and documented filter function "not" doesn't actually work. In what context? See below The par

[Geotools-devel] filter function "not"

2019-04-30 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello, I discovered that the implemented and documented filter function "not" doesn't actually work. The parser treats the word "not" as a reserved word, used for filters, therefore it does not manage to parse it as an identifier inside an expression. Perhaps I am missing something, but

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5793) MultiGeometry not working in GML 3.2 parser/encoded

2017-07-31 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5702) NetCDF support two-dimensional variable

2017-04-17 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] proposed change: coverage readers custom dimension data type conversion

2017-03-28 Thread Niels Charlier
with another fellow at GDIT, they might be affected (or not). I also know GeoMesa has their own custom readers, no idea if they are dimension enabled or not. Cc'ed Jim just in case. Cheers Andrea On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be&g

[Geotools-devel] proposed change: coverage readers custom dimension data type conversion

2017-03-22 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello, This message is particularly aimed at people who develop/use coverage readers that support custom dimensions, but are outside of the main geotools/geoserver code base. I am proposing a change that may affect them (see https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7989). In short: At

Re: [Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime pull requests

2017-03-01 Thread Niels Charlier
release, new features will have to wait for the master branch to switch to 18-snapshot/2.12-snapshot to be merged Cheers Andrea On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hello Simone, Daniele, I have made two p

[Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime pull requests

2017-03-01 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Simone, Daniele, I have made two pull requests with the aim of supporting "runtime" as an additional dimension in netcdf-java: The first is in the netcdf-java module itself: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1472 Rather than just adding runtime to the supported time and

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5637) Support NetCDF >4 dimensions, including runtime

2017-02-08 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] jai-ext initialisation

2016-12-16 Thread Niels Charlier
, Andrea Aime wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: I have another question though - why is geoserver doing this thing in GeoServerInitStartupListener? I'm not just asking about the place it is doing, why

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] jai-ext initialisation

2016-12-12 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello, I think this is a misunderstanding. I did not intend my email as a complaint or criticism (and especially not to make myself "feel better", I don't see it that way at all). It was merely intended as an entirely neutral issue report, like "hey, I found this thing that seemed to have

Re: [Geotools-devel] strange distortion from warp operation in ImageWorker

2016-11-22 Thread Niels Charlier
Indeed, makes sense that those are the two possible approaches to fix the problem. Regards Niels On 22-11-16 11:43, Andrea Aime wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Do you have an idea what could cau

Re: [Geotools-devel] strange distortion from warp operation in ImageWorker

2016-11-21 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Andrea, Thank you for your response. On 21-11-16 18:07, Andrea Aime wrote: Yes, a significant one under load testing, as it avoids the generation of one level of tiles in the chain, thus reducing both computation and load on the tile cache. So by turning it off you get the good looking

[Geotools-devel] strange distortion from warp operation in ImageWorker

2016-11-21 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello, We are getting strange distortions when zooming on a very large mosaic (see https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-7793), which appear to be caused by the JAI warp operation called in ImageWorker (see

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5578) GeometryReducer fails and logs a warning if source CRS is not WGS84

2016-11-18 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeometryReducer

2016-11-18 Thread Niels Charlier
, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hi Andrea, I have a question with regards to the GridGeometryReducer class, which you are credited with. Consider the following lines: https://github.com/geotools/geotools

[Geotools-devel] GeometryReducer

2016-11-09 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Andrea, I have a question with regards to the GridGeometryReducer class, which you are credited with. Consider the following lines: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/render/src/main/java/org/geotools/renderer/lite/gridcoverage2d/GridGeometryReducer.java#L86

Re: [Geotools-devel] Support two dimensional NetCDF coordinate variables

2016-10-14 Thread Niels Charlier
st main investigation of > the format was this exercise), so you may be able to improve on this! > > Kind regards > > Iain > > > On 12/10/2016 11:13 p.m., Niels Charlier wrote: >> Hello Iain, >> >> Thank you for your response. >> It looks like

Re: [Geotools-devel] Support two dimensional NetCDF coordinate variables

2016-10-12 Thread Niels Charlier
an happy push my management to > be allowed to continue my work on this. > > Thanks > Iain > > On 5/10/2016 10:18 p.m., Niels Charlier wrote: >> Hello Iain, >> >> Did you ever carry out your plans to support two dimension coordinate >> variables? >> >

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-10-07 Thread Niels Charlier
support pull request: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1296/commits/88bc830e570d805a3cd338e2d8dc2abde8d4fab7 https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1296 Regards Niels On 30-09-16 12:24, Niels Charlier wrote: Hi Daniele, Did you have any more comments on my last email? Would it make

Re: [Geotools-devel] Support two dimensional NetCDF coordinate variables

2016-10-05 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Iain, Did you ever carry out your plans to support two dimension coordinate variables? Kind Regards Niels On 06/20/2016 04:55 AM, Iain Matcham wrote: > Hi > > I have a number of netcdf files that I am trying to read with > gt-netcdf. However they use two dimensional coordinate

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-30 Thread Niels Charlier
? What are your thoughts? Regards Niels On 28-09-16 13:44, Niels Charlier wrote: Yeah, still that implies that the order of the files specified in the aggregation must be the same as the order of values for the aggregated dimension inside those files themselves. I can find no such specification

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-28 Thread Niels Charlier
() and getMaximum() is called. But then again, I wonder if we shouldn't do the same for non-time values (regular CoordinateValue). What do you think? Regards Niels On 28-09-16 11:41, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: Hi Niels, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mai

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-28 Thread Niels Charlier
On 23-09-16 17:03, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: I think that once the aggregation is in place, times can be in any order as you reported, so I think it's time to revisit the timeVariable min/max computation (not sure there are other methods around based on that supposition. I didn't check it yet).

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5528) NetCDF ncml list of aggregated files must be in order

2016-09-27 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime dimension question

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
machinery or remove that in favor of a better management of additional dimensions. Does it helps? Cheers, Daniele On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hello Daniele, As you know, I am working on support for

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
dimension (which is the case here)? Perhaps the issue is somewhere else in the code, and the values should be sorted after reading the list of files. Kind Regards Niels On 23-09-16 15:50, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: Hi Niels, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mai

[Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime dimension question

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Daniele, As you know, I am working on support for aggregation on runtime dimension in netcdf. I am now looking into what needs to happen in VariableAdaptor. I am very new at netcdf, so I do not yet understand everything that is happening to the fullest extent in this class. I have found

[Geotools-devel] netcdf issue: VariableAdapter returns wrong time index

2016-09-20 Thread Niels Charlier
See https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5515 Consider the following line in VariableAdapter https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/plugin/coverage-multidim/netcdf/src/main/java/org/geotools/imageio/netcdf/VariableAdapter.java#L1100 as compared to

Re: [Geotools-devel] App-Schema: Encoding of Filters on Nested Attributes

2016-09-14 Thread Niels Charlier
p 13, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hi Stefano, I think it is great you added that feature! A vast improvement to the work that I always had hoped would still be developed. Out of curiosity, why did you choose the

Re: [Geotools-devel] App-Schema: Encoding of Filters on Nested Attributes

2016-09-13 Thread Niels Charlier
For those who might be unfamiliar with it, the inner workings of the current joining implementation are clearly illustrated by Niels Charlier in this presentation: https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/pub/Infosrvices/GeoserverAppSchemaJoining/joining_presentation.pdf The aforementioned presentatio

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-08 Thread Niels Charlier
f Otherwise the one with the earliest time coordinates is last in the list instead of first... and geotools fails on this. Is this normal? This issue is definitely unrelated to netcdf-java, but I am not sure whether this is a bug in geotools or in the .ncml file. Regards Niels On 07-09-16

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5515) NetCDF: VariableAdapter returns wrong time index

2016-09-08 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5510) Net-cdf doesn't support the runtime dimension

2016-09-05 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5509) Net-cdf doesn't support some date formats

2016-09-05 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-08-17 Thread Niels Charlier
://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/WFS-to-WFS-NG-upgrade) Kind Regards Niels On 29-07-16 16:00, Niels Charlier wrote: You're right, I can just put it in main,seeing it already depends on wfs-ng. See https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1724 Regards Niels On 26-07-16 22:06, Jody

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-29 Thread Niels Charlier
the test to core (since it is testing the functionality of the geoserver catalog) - it may also be fine as a community module (as you indicated) to verify the change of functionality; it can be removed after the transition is complete -- Jody Garnett On 26 July 2016 at 05:16, Niels Charlier <

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-26 Thread Niels Charlier
of your success fixing wfs-ng. -- Jody Garnett On 25 July 2016 at 12:35, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Hi Jody, I've added a patch for WFS2.0 in MapServer to the existing PR. A couple more fixes are coming. Regards Niels

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-25 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Jody, I've added a patch for WFS2.0 in MapServer to the existing PR. A couple more fixes are coming. Regards Niels On 22-07-16 18:45, Jody Garnett wrote: Thanks for the positive feedback, Niels has a couple of pull requests ready and then we should be able to complete the "migration" ...

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-21 Thread Niels Charlier
Thanks Andrea, good idea On 21-07-16 14:15, Andrea Aime wrote: I don't know personally, but asked on mapserver-devel: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Support-for-wfs-2-0-on-mapserver-demo-td5277563.html Cheers Andrea On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-21 Thread Niels Charlier
misbehaviors as the Tuscany one did: http://demo.mapserver.org/cgi-bin/wfs?SERVICE=WFS=GetCapabilities Cheers Andrea On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: Andrea, This MapServer WFS url doesn't work any more. Now

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-18 Thread Niels Charlier
Andrea, This MapServer WFS url doesn't work any more. Now I can't test what was going wrong there ... Do you know where it went or if I can somehow test it still? Regards Niels On 27-06-16 14:44, Niels Charlier wrote: > On 24-06-16 17:10, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Anyways, I've fo

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-06-27 Thread Niels Charlier
On 24-06-16 17:10, Andrea Aime wrote: > Anyways, I've found again the links to the caps documents of the > mapserver and a tinyows in question... no idea if the problems are > still there, years have passed by and the servers might have been > upgraded in the meantime: > > MapServer WFS: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-06-24 Thread Niels Charlier
On 24-06-16 15:36, Andrea Aime wrote: I believe I sent you a list of mapserver and tinyows servers that were buggy vs the WFS spec and that the wfs store was configurable to work with anyways (as you may imagine, going to the server owner and asking for an upgrade or a different interpretation

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-06-24 Thread Niels Charlier
I'm digging up the WFS/WFS-NG datastore fight and want to sort it out once and for all. I am compiling a comprehensive list of what needs to happen for WFS-NG to become acceptable: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/WFS-to-WFS-NG-upgrade Any feedback/additions to this list are more than

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageMosaic API refactor proposal

2016-05-23 Thread Niels Charlier
/geotools/wiki/Refactor-ImageMosaic-for-extensibility Cheers, Devon On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: On 21-04-16 20:01, Jody Garnett wrote: Thanks for the clarification Niels, I was not aware that Prop

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-04-22 Thread Niels Charlier
Andre, The reason I closed it as "not a bug" was because I knew it was done by intentional design (not by me, but by the initial developer of wfs-ng) for a particular purpose and therefore I did not consider it a bug. You do make good points to criticise this choice, which does affect

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageMosaic API refactor proposal

2016-04-22 Thread Niels Charlier
anules) two different functions altogether. -- Jody Garnett On 21 April 2016 at 03:00, Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be <mailto:ni...@scitus.be>> wrote: On 17-04-16 04:17, Jody Garnett wrote: This proposal (and email thread) should be orthogonal to the RnD dis

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageMosaic API refactor proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Niels Charlier
On 17-04-16 04:17, Jody Garnett wrote: > This proposal (and email thread) should be orthogonal to the RnD > discussion on setting up a mosaic with multiple projections. > > This mosaic is focused on creating/managing the index used. One part I > cannot wrap my head around is the workflow behind

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-04-20 Thread Niels Charlier
Issue number (2) was unfortunately introduced when adding the complex store last year. Both of these issues can probably be resolved without *too* much effort. Of course we can't know for sure, but I am 95% convinced that once those few annoying roadblocks to using wfs-ng are resolved, it

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageMosaic API refactor proposal

2016-04-16 Thread Niels Charlier
fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message > that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty > or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent > messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they > were sent or f

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageMosaic API refactor proposal

2016-04-06 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Devon, Directory walking is part of the harvesting process, which is at the moment implemented inside the ImageMosaicReader (see the inner class HarvestedResource). In the API, there is a separate MosaicHarvester interface, as well as a very light ImageMosaicReader with all the logic

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

2016-04-04 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Simone, Daniele, List, Here is what we currently have for our proposal: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Refactor-ImageMosaic-for-extensibility. This is still is discussion phase, we'd like to hear your input :) Kind Regards Niels On 31-03-16 20:14, Niels Charlier wrote: I

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5392) Refactor ImageMosaic for extensibility

2016-03-31 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

2016-03-31 Thread Niels Charlier
I have looked at Daniele's PR (superficially) and it looks good, but I would expect a proposal is in order to move a lot of API from a plugin to a core module. As far as I can see, there is little or no overlap between the two bodies of work at the moment. I don't expect any issues there.

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5383) imagemosaic resolution unpredictable for multiple resolutions

2016-03-15 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5382) imagemosaic with multiple resolutions crashes when attempting to create the layer

2016-03-15 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] DEMStore community module

2016-02-10 Thread Niels Charlier
sorry, one was sent to the wrong list, please ignore On 10-02-16 17:21, Niels Charlier wrote: > I'd like permission to create a new community module called "demstore". > > This is a store specialised for Digital Elevation Models. The idea is to > merge different granules th

[Geotools-devel] DEMStore community module

2016-02-10 Thread Niels Charlier
I'd like permission to create a new community module called "demstore". This is a store specialised for Digital Elevation Models. The idea is to merge different granules that may be of different resolution and quality. It will be built on top of the mosaicstore with extra features such as -

[Geotools-devel] geotools unsupported module

2016-02-10 Thread Niels Charlier
I'd like permission to create a new unsupported module called "demstore". This is a store specialised for Digital Elevation Models. The idea is to merge different granules that may be of different resolution and quality. It will be built on top of the mosaicstore with extra features such as -

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5134) wfs-ng: better exception reporting

2015-05-28 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier created an issue

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5132) wfs-ng 2.0 not encoding spatial filters properly

2015-05-28 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier created an issue

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5133) WFS-NG: missing output formats

2015-05-28 Thread Niels Charlier (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Niels Charlier created an issue

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS-NG: missing output formats

2015-05-12 Thread Niels Charlier
On 12-05-15 11:11, Andrea Aime wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jan De Moerloose jan.demoerlo...@geosparc.com mailto:jan.demoerlo...@geosparc.com wrote: Hi, I did some more testing with the WFS client and found that the following formats are not accepted by the

Re: [Geotools-devel] geofence geoserver integration

2015-04-06 Thread Niels Charlier
know what you think. Regards Niels On 06-04-15 11:55, Niels Charlier wrote: Hi Emanuele, Are the geofence refactoring commits going to be pulled in the master branch in the official repo? Because I almost have a pull ready for gs-geofence-server but it depends on those changes being

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS-NG test work

2015-03-18 Thread Niels Charlier
would this be included in? 13.1? Sampo On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be mailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote: Sampo, Would you have the time to have a look at that? Or anyone else? Kind Regards Niels On 28-02-15 19:16, Niels Charlier wrote

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex feature parsing: wfs-ng and app-schema

2015-03-13 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Ben, I have had a look at this work. There is already quite some need for manual merging to get this to work, because a lot has changed in the meantime. At this moment I have two main concerns for merge: (1) The changes regarding AbstractDataStoreFactory and the new

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS-NG test work

2015-03-13 Thread Niels Charlier
Sampo, Would you have the time to have a look at that? Or anyone else? Kind Regards Niels On 28-02-15 19:16, Niels Charlier wrote: Hi, I have a new patch ready to improve the wfs-ng tests. All of this was done with the purpose of creating test cases for the new WFS 2.0 functionality. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues

2015-03-02 Thread Niels Charlier
...@gmail.com] namens Andrea Aime [andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it] *Verzonden:* vrijdag 27 februari 2015 12:55 *Aan:* Niels Charlier; Dries Jeroen *CC:* Ben Caradoc-Davies; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jody Garnett *Onderwerp:* Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:34 PM

[Geotools-devel] WFS-NG test work

2015-02-28 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi, I have a new patch ready to improve the wfs-ng tests. All of this was done with the purpose of creating test cases for the new WFS 2.0 functionality. I thought the test directory in wfs-ng was such a terrible mess it needed serious work first. A summary of what happened in this commit:

Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues

2015-02-27 Thread Niels Charlier
regards, Ben. On 27/02/15 10:52, Niels Charlier wrote: Hi, Okay, so according to the geotools documentation CRSes with full URI specification don't suffer from axis order confusions. But I have the following SRS used in a test: urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:26713 And here's the thing: when

Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues

2015-02-27 Thread Niels Charlier
On 27-02-15 11:52, Andrea Aime wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be mailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote: Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the detailed explanation, Ben. But my question remains: should gt-epsg-wkt

[Geotools-devel] axis order blues

2015-02-26 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi, Okay, so according to the geotools documentation CRSes with full URI specification don't suffer from axis order confusions. But I have the following SRS used in a test: urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:26713 And here's the thing: when running the test in maven, this is North-East, when

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex feature parsing: wfs-ng and app-schema

2015-02-05 Thread Niels Charlier
Yeah, I know what that's like, let's try to avoid that! Regards Niels On 04-02-15 20:57, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: That would be great! Rini will be back in October but merging earlier may prevent new conflicts. Kind regards, Ben. On 04/02/15 22:00, Niels Charlier wrote: Hi Ben, I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex feature parsing: wfs-ng and app-schema

2015-02-04 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Ben, I saw this but there was some comment from Jody about picking it up after she returned. I'm happy to have a look at it. I'll put it on my todo list. Kind Regards Niels On 03-02-15 20:11, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: Niels and Sampo, have you seen Rini's complex feature parsing pull

[Geotools-devel] Wfs-ng: enable WFS2.0 Transactions

2015-02-03 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi everyone, Following up on wfs 2.0 support in wfs-ng, I made a patch to support transactions as well: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/725 The main thing needed was the encoding. Note that an extensive test case for this encoding has been added in the commit. Proper testing of

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-19 Thread Niels Charlier
? Btw. Niels, what maven commands do you use to produce the build? It sounds like I'm missing some options or something. Sampo On Jan 16, 2015 6:10 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be mailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote: Sampo, it works for me

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-16 Thread Niels Charlier
chance you have time to check this? Sampo On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote: I have done so. Regards Niels On 15-01-15 18:21, Sampo Savolainen wrote: Hi, Can you push the rebased branch so I can test the exact same version? Sampo On Jan 15

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-16 Thread Niels Charlier
Sampo, it works for me in a tomcat. I think the issue must be with your setup. Regards Niels On 16-01-15 16:29, Niels Charlier wrote: I'll give it a try On 16-01-15 07:38, Sampo Savolainen wrote: Hi, This is weird: If I run GeoServer in eclipse using the Start class in gs-web-app

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-15 Thread Niels Charlier
I have done so. Regards Niels On 15-01-15 18:21, Sampo Savolainen wrote: Hi, Can you push the rebased branch so I can test the exact same version? Sampo On Jan 15, 2015 5:37 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote: Hello Sampo, I cannot reproduce this error. I have rebased everything

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-15 Thread Niels Charlier
. If it works for you, then I guess something goes wrong when rebasing the branch. Sampo On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote: Hello Sampo, Can you clarify how I can reproduce this problem, if it doesn't occur in the tests? Regards Niels On 15

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-14 Thread Niels Charlier
for the next stable release? Sampo On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be mailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote: Hello List, I finished something I started last year but never finished: enable WFS 2.0 in the wfs-ng module. Some of the work I had already

[Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 in wfs-ng module

2015-01-13 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello List, I finished something I started last year but never finished: enable WFS 2.0 in the wfs-ng module. Some of the work I had already prepared was sitting in a separate branch called wfs-ng-improvements-2.0. Some of the work done in this branch had in the meantime been done a second

  1   2   3   >