Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 13:33 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote: Not clear these are bugs, I'll gladly file bugs for them if it will help. (1) filters-recently used has a list of recnetly used fiters; these menu items bringup dialogue boxes, so they should have ... after the names, and

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread peter sikking
Sven wrote: Liam wrote: (2) am I the ony person bothered by having two entries for New in the file menu? They should probably be combined. So far no one came up with a good proposal on how this could be solved. the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item,

[Gimp-developer] Script-Fu Command Priority

2008-09-19 Thread Samuel
Hi there, the GIMP Script-Fu engine doesn't make a difference between registered definitions and local ones. This could be a problem, because if I write a script with a local function, but another script has that function too, GIMP could use the other function. With many scripts in the scripts

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item, the rest is OK to have in a sub-menu. My solution is to rename the 'New' sub-menu to 'Create' We have done that change in trunk. Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...' _must_ remain a first level menu item, agreed with that part... the rest is OK to have in a sub-menu. and with this... My solution is to rename the 'New' sub-menu to 'Create' so I think this is a good

Re: [Gimp-developer] some minor nits

2008-09-19 Thread SorinN
New Layer from Clipboard, New Layer from Screenshoot ( to be explicit and correct and to be online with the Usability rules ), anyway AS IS NOW is pretty OK. 2008/9/19 Liam R E Quin [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:46 +0200, peter sikking wrote: the structure is good: 'New...'

Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 72, Issue 15

2008-09-19 Thread Niels Giesen
Hi there, the GIMP Script-Fu engine doesn't make a difference between registered definitions and local ones. This could be a problem, because if I write a script with a local function, but another script has that function too, GIMP could use the other function. With many scripts in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.5.4 development release

2008-09-19 Thread bgw
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, GIMP 2.5.4 has been released yesterday. I would love to help, esp. with documentation as I learn about GIMP. But I'm unable to install 2.5.4. I got babl and gegl from svn repo babl]$ ./autogen.sh says I am going to run ./configure with the following arguments:

Re: [Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 2.5.4 development release

2008-09-19 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 20:09 -0700, bgw wrote: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for BABL... configure: error: Package requirements (babl = 0.0.22) were not met: No package 'babl' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you