will be alaways many complains if some of the mode included in photoshop
http://www.freetimefoto.com/photoshop_blending_mode would be missed in gimp.
with some reasons that make harder exchange of tip, tricks and files between
people doing similar jobs (or sharing same hobby) but using differ
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/05/2009 02:10 AM, photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
> > But even if conceptually different in practice , both operation are always
> > needed for the every edited image:
> > is needed to Save the original AND to export as jpg o
Hi,
On 10/05/2009 02:10 AM, photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
> But even if conceptually different in practice , both operation are always
> needed for the every edited image:
> is needed to Save the original AND to export as jpg or png .
This assumption is wrong. Complex compositions will need to be
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 16:59 -0500, Chris Mohler wrote:
> So, I've written a replacement plug-in that works pretty well.
> However, the only filetype supported is still .XCF.
I don't quite understand where this limitation comes from. If you allow
the user to enter any filename, then GIMP will
yahvuu wrote:
>> actually a question for peter (yahvuu): how complete is this
>> overview?
>
> most notably, the porter-duff modes are not listed.
> I'll have a look to make the overview as complete as possible.
I am interested in that. modes are like a box of chocolates,
you'll never know what
peter sikking wrote:
> actually a question for peter (yahvuu): how complete is this overview?
most notably, the porter-duff modes are not listed.
I'll have a look to make the overview as complete as possible.
> first, I know now why our Darken section is one Shorter that our
> Lighten one: we ar
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Stephen wrote:
> I would like to work on Bug 306713 - Write a GIMP plug-in and resource
> distribution system
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306713
Just one thing. These days resources like *.gpl and *.ggr can be used
by more apps than just GIMP.
We a
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Stephen Craig Griffiths
wrote:
> Can anyone provide (a) use case(s)?
I've also told about my main use for such a thing. Having an in-gimp
way to provide this functionality would be cherry on the cake.
I can agree that a package needs to be self contained, no deps
> Any technical comments on this solution?
I think I will just say scratch that idea, it would work for
installing but it was not well thought out otherwise :).
Anyhow, I posted on the GHNS mailing list, mostly quoting Alexia Death
and asking if anyone has used ghns for dependencies before.
