On 5/20/07, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will try to raise this with the Metacity project.
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/save-changes-integrated-3/
I don't think you want to go too far down this path. A significant
portion of GIMP users run Windows and WMs other than
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:29:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> There is nothing more annoying that a window that resizes itself. In
> particular because it is very difficult, if not impossible, to get this
> right with all the various window managers being used by our users. The
> window manage
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 16:20 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> No. Either being able to see the canvas is important, in which case
> adding the message and resizing the image window can be better than
> having the user move a window around.
There is nothing more annoying that a window that res
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Well, you have overlooked the main problem here. If you add user
> interface elements to the image window, then these will cover parts of
> the canvas and there will be no way to unobscure the covered parts. So
> if you think that i
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 20:33 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> It already shares focus and minimising with the image window.
> It being a semi-separate window is only good for moving it.
> Moving it is only good for getting to see the whole canvas.
> If it would not cover any part of the canvas,
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > >>>http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
> I'm not at all convinced about the presentation of this modal,
> tied to another window while looking like any other window
> itself dialog, though.
> It a
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:38:19PM +0200, peter sikking wrote:
> >>>http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
> It is a modal dialog situation: we need a decision now.
Yes, the scope being the image. Regarding that one image window,
a decision is needed, outside not.
>
Thorsten,
>>> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
>>
>> Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
>> solve for one million users.
>
> The current Save Changes dialog tends obscure the image.
It is a modal dialog situation: we need a decision now.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:41:39PM +0200, peter sikking wrote:
> >http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
>
> Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
> solve for one million users.
The current Save Changes dialog tends obscure the image.
If users
Thorsten,
> Image window and Save Changes dialog turned into one:
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
solve for one million users.
I am all for reusing the main window (save for web, preparing a print)
Hi!
Image window and Save Changes dialog turned into one:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
--
Thorsten Wilms
Thorwil's Design for Free Software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-develope
11 matches
Mail list logo
