On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: 06 Feb 2004 11:50:54 +0100
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Updated roadmap (so people don't laugh at
the old one)
Hi
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can certainly spread it around. I update the NEWS now, as
well as you. Anyone can do that. Same thing goes for making the
announcement on freshmeat, gnome-desktop, linuxartist... I can do
bugzilla tags.
Well, I am certainly not going to ask for
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can certainly spread it around. I update the NEWS now, as
well as you. Anyone can do that. Same thing goes for making the
announcement on freshmeat, gnome-desktop, linuxartist... I can do
bugzilla tags.
Well, I am certainly
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I am certainly not going to ask for this and so far I have
always waited about a day if someone else would post announcements on
gnomedesktop and other sites. But it seems that noone but me is
interested enough to post there, so I guess I
Sven Neumann wrote:
Comments off-list don't count. If people want to comment on this
subject, they should do it on the list. Everything else is just noise.
Maybe they should, but that doesn't mean that they will. It's a lot
easier to drop an email to the person that you agree with, than to
jump
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This roadmap should not be seen as set in stone, but I agree with
Freedman Dyson that it is better to be precise and wrong than to
be vague. If we set ourselves vague targets, then we will arrive
at them a long time after we'd like.
So what?
So,
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This roadmap should not be seen as set in stone, but I agree with
Freedman Dyson that it is better to be precise and wrong than to
be vague. If we set ourselves vague targets, then we will arrive
at them a long time after we'd like.
So
Hi Dave,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This roadmap should not be seen as set in stone, but I agree with
Freedman Dyson that it is better to be precise and wrong than to
be vague. If we set ourselves vague targets, then we will arrive
at them a long time after we'd like.
So what?
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:27, Sven Neumann wrote:
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
So, without further ado, here's the updated roadmap... are there
any comments?
[snip]
The GIMP project is already putting up enough pressure without
people trying to nail us down on release
Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:27, Sven Neumann wrote:
[...] nail us down [...]
[snip]
Imposing a fixed release schedule [...]
[snip]
[...] this road map should not be set in stone.
I think both you and Sven have somewhat missed the point. The funny thing is, we
are
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not trying to nail anyone down. I don't think anyone is. I'm not
*imposing* anything. The roadmap (as has been shown by the last one)
is *not* set in stone.
We all know that but your roadmap gave a different impression. Instead
of pointing out
Hi,
First, I'd like to say that I think it's a pity that you replied
so aggressively to the mail - I would have liked to hear more
comments, but I think that the tone of the thread may have
intimidated people somewhat.
Sven Neumann wrote:
We all know that but your roadmap gave a different
Hi all,
Some people thought it was ridiculous to fix dates on events when
we had GIMPCon at the CCC in August - after all, we haven't done
that in the past, and it'll be done when it's done is almost a
motto for some people around.
The thing is that we did make a roadmap, though - and we've
13 matches
Mail list logo
