Hi,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 20:33 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
It already shares focus and minimising with the image window.
It being a semi-separate window is only good for moving it.
Moving it is only good for getting to see the whole canvas.
If it would not cover any part of the canvas,
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Well, you have overlooked the main problem here. If you add user
interface elements to the image window, then these will cover parts of
the canvas and there will be no way to unobscure the covered parts. So
if you think that it
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 16:20 +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
No. Either being able to see the canvas is important, in which case
adding the message and resizing the image window can be better than
having the user move a window around.
There is nothing more annoying that a window that
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 04:29:34PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
There is nothing more annoying that a window that resizes itself. In
particular because it is very difficult, if not impossible, to get this
right with all the various window managers being used by our users. The
window manager
On 5/20/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try to raise this with the Metacity project.
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/save-changes-integrated-3/
I don't think you want to go too far down this path. A significant
portion of GIMP users run Windows and WMs other than
Thorsten,
Image window and Save Changes dialog turned into one:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
solve for one million users.
I am all for reusing the main window (save for web, preparing a print)
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:41:39PM +0200, peter sikking wrote:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
solve for one million users.
The current Save Changes dialog tends obscure the image.
If users
Thorsten,
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
Somehow I do not know what structural problem you are trying to
solve for one million users.
The current Save Changes dialog tends obscure the image.
It is a modal dialog situation: we need a decision now.
The
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:38:19PM +0200, peter sikking wrote:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
It is a modal dialog situation: we need a decision now.
Yes, the scope being the image. Regarding that one image window,
a decision is needed, outside not.
If
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/save-changes-integrated/
I'm not at all convinced about the presentation of this modal,
tied to another window while looking like any other window
itself dialog, though.
It already
10 matches
Mail list logo
