i definitely want to get more involved with gimp development. (at the moment,
i would most like to upgrade the palette-editor to match or exceed a general
palette editor i wrote previously.)
my involvement has been impeded by these things:
- lack of documentation (hard to find my way
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, david gowers wrote:
in the realm of 'discussion', does anyone here know why GimpPalette is
implemented using a list? it seems a lot saner to use an array.
i would like to convert it to use an array if possible, as it would simplify
future enhancements, and hopefully remove
Hi,
Marco Lamberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll be happy if palettes were sorted not only by name
Are you refering to how the list of palettes is sorted or to the order
of the colors in the palette?
Sven
PS: http://adrian.gimp.org/sortpal/
___
On 31 Dec 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
I'll be happy if palettes were sorted not only by name
Are you refering to how the list of palettes is sorted or to the order
of the colors in the palette?
The list of palettes. ;)
--
//\/\ Marco (LM) Lamberto (lm AT sunnyspot DOT org)
The Sunny Spot -
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The point is that you misunderstood what a selection is. A selection
is a mask holding a selection value between 0 and 255 for each pixel
in the image. What you see on the GIMP canvas is just the selection
border
OK. I was writing about a tool which is used
At 03:14 PM 12/30/2003 -0800, you wrote:
It is not as if people dislike the new site; the only thing that
remains is replacing the old site with it.
One possibility for the short term would be to create a redirect from
www.gimp.org to the new site.
Cheers!
Kevin.
At 07:57 PM 12/31/2003 -0500, david gowers wrote:
in the realm of 'discussion', does anyone here know why GimpPalette is
implemented using a list? it seems a lot saner to use an array.
Just as a guess, if you mean 'linked list' by 'list', then its probably to
avoid the headaches created by using
