Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 17:54 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
Could make sense to ask on the gimp-user list. But as far as I can see,
saving the current drawable is the only reasonable use case. We might
want to consider to make this easier by adding Save Layer and
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:14 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
So basically the whole dialog is useless and could just as well be
replaced by assuming that the user clicked Export... and maybe a
notice in save dialog that any other format except xcf may cause some
data loss. That should be
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:14 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
So basically the whole dialog is useless and could just as well be
replaced by assuming that the user clicked Export... and maybe a
notice in save dialog that any other format except xcf may cause some
data
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:45 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
I don't quite understand. What dialog is useless?
Export file... dialog you get on saves to formats that are not xcf. It
does ask in some formats for conversion options but I doubt many people
have ever done anything else there
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:45 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
I don't quite understand. What dialog is useless?
Export file... dialog you get on saves to formats that are not xcf. It
does ask in some formats for conversion options but I doubt many people
have ever done
Hi all,
here is a spec which claims to clean up the existent save/export features in a
consistent manner.
Problems addressed:
- insufficient protection from data loss regarding layer alpha information.
This is considered a UI bug [7]. For an example see [1].
- too many dialogs which pop up
Hi again,
here's the first correction:
in section Conversion Rules,
read 'common format affected' as 'one example of a format affected by this
dialog'.
The conversion rules are listed by the current dialogs' texts to present the
user's point of view.
These dialogs are triggered by format
From my user perspective, I'm ok with the save / export separation.
- Save only for XCF
- Export for other formats (using the current method, guess format by
extension, or manual selection of the output format).
We users are used to save anything, despite if it's a lossy format or
not, and that's
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
It's not clear what Save Visible Layers would do. Would it save the
merged image of all visible layers into a single layer
Yes. I.e. like doing a flatten and then a save and then an undo.
I don't have strong feelings about it, but since
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:17 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
It's not clear what Save Visible Layers would do. Would it save the
merged image of all visible layers into a single layer
Yes. I.e. like doing a flatten and then a save and
Hi,
Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
gib_mir_mehl wrote:
Don't all those export troubles disintegrate once we presume a little
more confidence in the undo function?
More confidence will require a option to save undo history.
As it is now once the image is closed its Undo History
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:35:27 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would a user interface look like for exporting undo history and
for merging the history with the image again?
Are there already proposals for this?
Just my take... is this not something that GEGL and the non-destructive
Jon Senior wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would a user interface look like for exporting undo history and
for merging the history with the image again?
Are there already proposals for this?
Just my take... is this not something that GEGL and the non-destructive
editing will take
13 matches
Mail list logo
