David Weeks wrote:
> Tolerance isn't the lack of criticism, and intolerance isn't the act of
> criticism, and beyond that, some things are tolerable, and some things are
> not. So let's drop the "troll" "intolerant" "ignorant" crap and deal with
> information. These reactions are human nature,
Jeez,
Guys, perhaps it was wrong for me to do the French/American thing, but I was
drawing on historical examples. All the same, I'd not respect anyone who
didn't respect their own country. I LOVE America, as an American, and I have
MAJOR problems with much of America, just the same.
Toleran
On Nov 28 Carol Spears ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> $1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
> GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
>
If any GIMP developers come to visit Research Triangle Park (Central
North Carolina, USA) please drop me an email. I'd be happy
On 2002-11-28 at 1259.18 -0500, Patrick McFarland typed this:
> Hrm. Side note, They got $1k from Linuxfund to further their project... hrm...
>
$1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
carol
__
On 28-Nov-2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> the point is that the new film-gimp maintainer or any of the people
> working on film-gimp don't communicate with us at all. The project
> somehow came back to life without any notification on this
> mailing-list. We had to hear about it in the news. Among
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-11-27 at 2219.52 -0500):
> From what I heard, Gimp originally declined a merge with the
> hollywood branch, which I see as a serious mistake. Gimp isnt
> photoshop, and it isnt any other program that people compare it
> to. Gimp is more than all of them. And thanks to FG, Gi
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> Perhaps replace it by pcre (www.pcre.org). It is pretty widely
> used these days.
>
The problem with Perl-compatible regular expression is that they are
NP-complete:
http://perl.plover.com/NPC/
"Normal" regular expressions are polynomial time. Througho
Hi,
Dov Grobgeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps replace it by pcre (www.pcre.org). It is pretty widely
> used these days.
before you (or Robin) start to look for yet another regex replacement,
you should probably have a look into the current GIMP development tree
which has the problem so
Hi,
Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I dont agree with the gimp and film gimp development groups. Film
> Gimp should be eventually folded into Gimp 2.0. Having two branches
> like this sucks bad. Film Gimp is slowly turning into something
> that isnt gimp at all, and I see alot of
David Weeks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I called you right the first time. You don't know jack about much, and
> nothing about the rest of it.
> [...]
Huh?
The Gimp-Developer Mailing list is *not* about personal insulting
people you apparently don't like.
While the approach taken by Robin - b
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> you know what is perpetually annoying? Guys who think
> they know everything but apparently ignore what tolerance and openness
> mean. Guys who are not open to other points of view. Guys who have
> very important rants to write and cannot afford to spend five minutes
> or
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:24:24 -0500, David Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I live in Florida. Tampa specifically, which is a great city, even if I do
> live here. And know what is perpetually annoying? Yankees coming down
> talking about how they do it up North.
I live in Belgium. Liège sp
12 matches
Mail list logo
