Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > Let's call each help-tree, either installed by gimp-help or by a > plug-in, a help domain. The problem I see is that the current proposal > doesn't define a way to link between help domains. While for example > the freetype plug-in mig

Re: [Gimp-developer] fun with Adobe forums

Alan Horkan wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: So, did you guys know that Disney considered using the GIMP and/or Cinepaint, but instead paid some coders to make sure PS runs in WINE? Yup. When this was on Slashdot I did m

Re: [Gimp-developer] fun with Adobe forums

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > > So, did you guys know that Disney considered using the GIMP and/or > > Cinepaint, but instead paid some coders to make sure PS runs in > > WINE? > > > > > Yup. When this was on Slashdot I did m

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Firmed out roadmap

Branko Collin wrote: > The trouble with the road to 1.4/2.0 was (if I, as a non-programmer, > see this correctly) that the whole of the GIMP had to be changed. It > was not possible to release 2.0 piecemeal, the change of 1.2 to 2.0 > as the stable version had to be in one go. Personally, I thi

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: GIMP 1.3.19

Hi all, The next release in the development series of the GIMP, version 1.3.19, is now available for download from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.3/v1.3.19/ or from one of the mirrors listed at http://gimp.org/download.html We think this is good enough for daily use. We are now very close to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Firmed out roadmap

On 26 Aug 2003, at 20:53, David Neary wrote: > Sven Neumann wrote: > > David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here is a roadmap with some meat on it (solid dates for > > > milestones and other stuff) - it's pretty aggressive, > > > particularly with respect to a 2.2 release next year. [..

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against softwarepatents in Europe

Hi Raphaël, my wishes are with You and this protest. Kai-Uwe Behrmann Am 26.08.03, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Raphaël Quinet: > Well, this may be a bit controversial, but I thought about supporting > the demonstration against software patents in Europe by replacing the > GIMP home page by the followi

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Firmed out roadmap

Hi, just wanted to let you know that the tree seems to pass 'make distcheck' now. Well, at least up to the point very late in the process where it used to break for quite a while already... I don't want to delay 1.3.19 any longer, so the tree is basically fine for a release. Perhaps the NEWS file

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2

Hi, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This approach also covers 3rd party plug-ins since they can tell the > gimp where their help tree is. The help browser has access to this > path and can simply open the gimp-help.xml file from that given help > path. I thought about this some mo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against software patentsin Europe

Raphaël Quinet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Is anybody against that kind of action on the GIMP web site? If there > is any strong opposition against it, then there is no need to have a > long debate: I will simply forget about it. Otherwise, I would like > to replace the home page of www.gimp.org

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against software patentsin Europe

MiLUG's associates (Milano Linux Users Group - Italy) do appreciate a lot what you're doing. Best regards, mop. -- Matteo Nastasi - Milano - Italy | HomePage: www.alternativeoutput.it Sostenere e supportare GNU/Linux ! | IRCnet: #c-it Milano Linux | E-Mail: [E

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Firmed out roadmap

Sven Neumann wrote: Don't get me wrong. I think your schedule is reasonable and we should definitely publish a roadmap but IMO it shouldn't include any dates. what about sufficiently vague date? ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://l

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against softwarepatents in Europe

Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: If they aprove it in Europe, it will be a matter of a few months before they catch on here (Brazil). We are at risk even with Europe being free. Do it or we will all be slaves soon. -- Jonathan C. Sitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[Gimp-developer] Re: [Gimp-user] Firmed out roadmap

Hi, Sven Neumann wrote: > David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Here is a roadmap with some meat on it (solid dates for > > milestones and other stuff) - it's pretty aggressive, > > particularly with respect to a 2.2 release next year. > > I really like the idea of setting a date for a fea

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against softwarepatents in Europe

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:12:46 -0700 (PDT), Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > > [...] Otherwise, I would > > like to replace the home page of www.gimp.org later today (let's say in > > three or four hours). > > Before doing that, please c

Re: [Gimp-developer] Proposal for protesting against softwarepatents in Europe

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Raphaël Quinet wrote: > Well, this may be a bit controversial, I don't think that there is any disagreement about software patents among the major gimp developers. > but I thought about supporting the demonstration against software > patents in Europe by replacing the GIMP h