Hi David!
> As far as I know, foreground and background are still objectively
different from the computer's point of view and our point of view; they have
different characteristics. A background tends to
> be less detailed than a foreground; also, the definition of background is
further muddied
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:27:19PM +0200, Gerald Friedland wrote:
>
> I do not quite understand your problems. I am an aloof developer who
> has serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
> out, maybe I am misunderstanding something? So please do not get me
> wrong here.
>
he
.. I replied to the wrong address again; argh.On 6/24/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/06, Gerald Friedland <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not quite understand your problems. I am an aloof developer whohas serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
out, may
> I guessed from what Sven said, inverting the image colors first might
help, and I was right.
> I made my second try by:
>
> * Inverting the image
> * Selecting the entire image in the initial 'lasso' pass.
> * Disabling 'Contiguous'
> * Setting L,a,b sensitivity to 0,707,555 respectively. (a,b w
... AARRGH.
Accidentally sent this to Sven instead of the list!
Sorry Sven.On 6/23/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The tool only does foreground extraction (hence its name). There's no
toggle that would turn it into a background extraction tool.
Makes sense, actually -- the characteri
