Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:43 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Many thanks, here there is another:
http://www.ciampix.net/color2alpha.png
This string is marked for translation, it's in POTFILES and it even
seems to be translated to italian. What exactly is the screenshot
showing?
Sven
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 19:52 -0700, Karl Chen wrote:
Deskew, also known as auto straighten, rotates an image such that
text is straight -- useful when dealing with scanned images.
Looks very nice. I have always found this simple to do in GIMP using the
Rotate tool in Corrective mode,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:40:52AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:43 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Many thanks, here there is another:
http://www.ciampix.net/color2alpha.png
This string is marked for translation, it's in POTFILES and it even
seems to be
Accessing the size and rotate settings through the pdb would be great,
here is a lot of ways that I would end up using it...
I have a few scripts where I have needed to change rotation and size of
a brush... What I've ended up doing is creating a new layer, paint one
instance at x,y, and then
Hello Sven,
Sven Neumann ha scritto:
...
This string is marked for translation, it's in POTFILES and it even
seems to be translated to italian. What exactly is the screenshot
showing?
The screenshot should refer to the Layers - Transparency submenu.
Cheers.
--
Alessandro Falappa
web:
Greetings,
I'm glad to see that GIMP is incorporating a brush scaling mechanism. I've
been waiting for a long time for something like this! Although, it would be
nice if the brush can scale up and down, instead of simply scaling down.
This is something that I use quite a lot when painting. The
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 15:16 +0200, Van Aarde Krynauw wrote:
Greetings,
I'm glad to see that GIMP is incorporating a brush scaling mechanism.
I've been waiting for a long time for something like this! Although,
it would be nice if the brush can scale up and down, instead of simply
scaling
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:35:43PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:40:52AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:43 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Many thanks, here there is another:
http://www.ciampix.net/color2alpha.png
This string is
Pals,
As you noticed, this is my first plugin and I have many silly
questions... Sorry for bothering you with these.
What my plugin does is an iterpolation to get rid of noise by
means of a classical local analysis of a square neighborhood or
radius r of each pixel to change it (if
From: Luis A. Florit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ . . . ]
My questions: When to use one and when two iterators? Which one
should I use for a procedure like the one described in my plugin?
Is this indeed faster than the method I implemented based in myblur5.c?
You probably shouldn't do this at all.
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 10:39 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
You probably shouldn't do this at all. The gimp_pixel_rgns_process
method handles the data tile by tile, which means that it is impossible,
or at least quite difficult, to handle interactions that extend across
multiple tiles. It
Hi, i have a friend who's just migrating off windows and is currently
running Ubuntu which he's generally happy with.
He complained about save for web functionality missing from the stock
GIMP and had some good points on why it's needed, i found the
save-for-web plugin through Linux for
Sven and Bill,
I see. My plugin is already reasonably fast, so is good to
know I don't need huge changes.
Thanks a lot for your prompt answer!! Nice forum!
Cheers,
Luis.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
First off, I want to apologize - it's not my intention to be
combative, and I can be a total ass sometimes. Secondly, I wonder if
we should make two feature requests: the first for a dockable
magnifier with options, and the second for a key-triggered pop-up
version of the same magnifier. Should
14 matches
Mail list logo
