Re: [Gimp-developer] Extending GIMP Plugins
On 8/26/07, Amit Kumar Saha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, I would like to know, when GEGL is integrated into the GIMP, will it be available for the Plugins to access the GEGL as well? The plan is that GEGL integration into GIMP will start after 2.4 is released and the 2.5 development cycle will be devoted to a process of gradual replacement, without changing the GUI significantly, thus 2.6 should be a version of GIMP that hasn't changed a lot of the GUI, but a development cycle that leads up to a GEGLified version of GIMP that can see further development and innovation. According to the plan GEGL will replace all code in the GIMP that is accessing and or modifying pixels, some forms of GIMP plug-ins will most likely be entirely replaced by GEGL plug-ins instead. And as mentioned elsewhere in this thread, GEGL plug-ins can either be descriptions of graphs, or actual C code. Another option that should already be possible if someone is thus inclined, is actually to write a GIMP plug-in for GIMP 2.4 that allows GEGL plug-ins to be used directly by current versions of GIMP, this is less interesting than another bridge that will have to be written, which is a wrapper for (at least some of) the exisitng GIMP plug-ins to work from within GEGL, this will be needed to provide legacy support for some of the older plug-ins (these plug-ins will thus still work, but have limitations wrt bit-depth and such). /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/http://ffii.org/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Print Dialog - Seg faults in 2.4RC1
Von: Tim Jedlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I select the Print button, I get a segmentation fault: [...] Anything obvious I should check. Bugzilla - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=GIMP. It might also be useful to watch the Bugzilla user bugs(at)gimp.org, you will then receive mail notifications of changes (granularity is configurable) to bugs in the GIMP product. You would most likely have noticed bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 or one of its duplicates then. HTH, Michael -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] any plans to repack RC1 or release RC2?
Sorry for posting here, but RC1 is really unusable - it can crash on every image. As it was said, the bug had been fixed in SVN. Are there plans to release RC2 or repack RC1 with the bug fixed? RC should be tested, but it's impossible with RC1. -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] any plans to repack RC1 or release RC2?
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:28 +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Sorry for posting here, but RC1 is really unusable - it can crash on every image. As it was said, the bug had been fixed in SVN. Are there plans to release RC2 or repack RC1 with the bug fixed? RC should be tested, but it's impossible with RC1. Indeed :-) We will not repack anything, but there will be RC2 this week. ciao, --mitch ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Extending GIMP Plugins
Hello all, On 8/27/07, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the plan GEGL will replace all code in the GIMP that is accessing and or modifying pixels, some forms of GIMP plug-ins will most likely be entirely replaced by GEGL plug-ins instead. And as mentioned elsewhere in this thread, GEGL plug-ins can either be descriptions of graphs, or actual C code. Another option that should already be possible if someone is thus inclined, is actually to write a GIMP plug-in for GIMP 2.4 that allows GEGL plug-ins to be used directly by current versions of GIMP, this is less interesting than another bridge that will have to be written, which is a wrapper for (at least some of) the exisitng GIMP plug-ins to work from within GEGL, this will be needed to provide legacy support for some of the older plug-ins (these plug-ins will thus still work, but have limitations wrt bit-depth and such). My current work at hand will possibly require me to write a plugin for GIMP (current version) which will use GEGL for its image processing operations. So if I proceed, I shall let the list know. Here a couple of more queries: 1. Does any of the developers here have some demo C code which takes in a XML file specification of the operations and performs the image processing tasks using GEGEL? 2. Can I assume safely that most of the image processing operations are applying the same operation to each pixel of the image? Thanks -- Amit Kumar Saha [URL]:http://amitsaha.in.googlepages.com ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Extending GIMP Plugins
Amit Kumar Saha wrote: 1. It seems from the documentation that, I can specify the operations as a XML file as above instead of creating a DAG. How do i then use that file to apply the operations? Looking again at the API there is the gegl_parse_xml() routine. There is an example of XML code being used to specify a set of operations to be performed as well as the execution of those operations in the gegl binary file (found in the gegl source tree). What about error checking? What operations are supported? I haven't tried this recently. I'm not sure what happens if there are errors in the input XML file. You may get either an incomplete GeglNode structure (ie. one not containing all parts of the input XML) or NULL. The API doc doesn't specify which. All GEGL operations can be used in an XML file. 2. Can I work with the individual pixels of an Image using GEGL? Say I want GEGL to work with only certain range of pixels of my Image, is it possible? I din't think it is possible to work on individual pixels of an image. Øyvind Kolås would be the person who could give you the more definite answer on this. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |What are we going to do today, Borg? Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |Same thing we always do, Pinkutus: | Try to assimilate the world! #include disclaimer/favourite | -Pinkutus the Borg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] any plans to repack RC1 or release RC2
Michael Natterer wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:31:00 -0700 On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:28 +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Sorry for posting here, but RC1 is really unusable - it can crash on every image. As it was said, the bug had been fixed in SVN. Are there plans to release RC2 or repack RC1 with the bug fixed? RC should be tested, but it's impossible with RC1. Indeed :-) We will not repack anything, but there will be RC2 this week. There has been a bug which crept into GIMP-GAP 2.2.2 (my fault) and there should probably be new GAP release before/when GIMP 2.4 is released (reference Bugzilla #468631: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468631). I am not sure how this should be handled but did not wish it to go unnoticed. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
