Hi,
On Feb 11, 2008 9:29 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You aren't perhaps working with an image in Indexed mode, are you?
>
Yes, my fault.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.ED
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
> The patch is for this specific file:
> http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gimp/trunk/plug-ins/gfli/fli.c
> It fixes two problems:
> * loading of fli files that specified width=height=0 (that means 320x200)
Where is this specified?
> * writing
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 09:00 +0200, Aurimas Juška wrote:
> I just installed gimp 2.4.4 for Windows from binary distribution. Now,
> setting blending opacity >= 50 results in full opacity, otherwise - no
> opacity.
You aren't perhaps working with an image in Indexed mode, are you?
Sven
___
Hi,
I just installed gimp 2.4.4 for Windows from binary distribution. Now,
setting blending opacity >= 50 results in full opacity, otherwise - no
opacity.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.ED
On Feb 10, 2008 4:16 PM, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right-click is a shortcut for a primary way to do things. So in
> this case I see good chances for the not-so-often-used options
> to go in their own little menu that gets accessed from a
> small-no-relief-low-contrast-icon button
Bill wrote:
> peter sikking wrote:
>> There are some deeper problems with those buttons (why are they
>> there,
>> allt the time, so prominently?), the ones in the layer dialog
>> excepted.
>
> I agree with this. I too think it would be best to have buttons only
> for the layers/channels/path
On Feb 10, 2008 1:18 PM, peter sikking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some deeper problems with those buttons (why are they there,
> allt the time, so prominently?), the ones in the layer dialog excepted.
I agree with this. I too think it would be best to have buttons only
for the layers
To follow up for people who don't necessarily look at Bugzilla, this
change has been committed to trunk at Mitch's request, and
Mitch converted it into a style property, defaulting to "no relief" as
shown in the screenshot, so that, should there happen to be
anybody who wants the button relief, the
Bill wrote:
> I have been experimenting with ways of simplifying the user
> interface, and
> one very simple change that I think gives a rather dramatic
> improvement
> in appearance is to remove the "relief" from the buttons that
> appear at
> the bottom of numerous dialogs. This is a requ
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:55:13 +0100, Bill Skaggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been experimenting with ways of simplifying the user interface,
> and
> one very simple change that I think gives a rather dramatic improvement
> in appearance is to remove the "relief" from the buttons that appe
I have been experimenting with ways of simplifying the user interface, and
one very simple change that I think gives a rather dramatic improvement
in appearance is to remove the "relief" from the buttons that appear at
the bottom of numerous dialogs. This is a request for discussion. I have
filed
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
> Hello, I don't know if I should send patches to this list, but anyway,
> I think that it's a good place.
We would prefer if you opened one or even several bug reports at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ with a description of the problems you
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 20:25 -0200, David Capello wrote:
> On the other hand, I think that the GFLI plug-in has other problems
> (in the gfli.c file).
IMO we should remove this plug-in from the main distribution. It doesn't
seem to be very useful for the main target audience and it appears to
13 matches
Mail list logo
