On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Guillermo Espertino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please consider adding typographic elements (logos, text) and
> icons/diagrams to the test images.
> One of the most critic use cases where downscaling shows issues is with
> high contrast such as dark typography on l
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:19 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
>
>> Personally I think the test is being run under flawed conditions
>> (using nonlinear sRGB rather than linear RGB, which produces errors of
>> up to 50%
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 09:19 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> Personally I think the test is being run under flawed conditions
> (using nonlinear sRGB rather than linear RGB, which produces errors of
> up to 50% because interpolation is done linearly despite the
> colorspace being nonlinear.). How
Please consider adding typographic elements (logos, text) and
icons/diagrams to the test images.
One of the most critic use cases where downscaling shows issues is with
high contrast such as dark typography on light backgrounds.
This is particularly important when working with small designs for the
> Here are some images that may help show some problems -- colour photos
> tend to hide problems, partly because the eye sees the subject more
> easily and auto-corrects flaws, and partly because the hardest thing
> for rescaling is often preserving both texture and sharpness. Of
> course, most pe
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:15:38 +0200, Liam R E Quin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:14 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
>
>> > The one thing I definitely can't do is
>> > * Host webpage.
>
> I can do that if you want, although gimp.org would be better.
> As long as it's under a gigab
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 18:30 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> The one thing I definitely can't do is
> * Host webpage.
I don't think we have enough space currently on gimp.org to host this.
But it doesn't really matter where it is hosted. I can put the stuff
online if you give me a tarball that I
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:14 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> > The one thing I definitely can't do is
> > * Host webpage.
I can do that if you want, although gimp.org would be better.
As long as it's under a gigabyte or so.
Here are some images that may help show some problems -- colour photos
tend
Hi,
I've just completed producing images without the patch (using old
scaling code) for None and Linear methods.
This amounts to 2*77 = 154 images totalling 110 MB. Some of these I
plan to discard, for the cases where the old and new code produce the
same result.
One of the photos had transparency
I can do at least half of this task, possibly most of it.
* decide on test images:
2 landscapes
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hapal/2292885459/sizes/l/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2432037855/sizes/l/ (or size
o/ )
3 portraits
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aturku
10 matches
Mail list logo
