Hi Dave,
GNOME Foundation
c/o Novell, Inc.
8 Cambridge Center
Floor 5
Cambridge, MA 02142
Perhaps the country name could be added as well? Otherwise people may
assume it is the first Cambridge (UK) or one of the other international
cities using the same name.
Regards
JG
be happy to donate to (way 1 below) the GIMP
group, if this new layout idea could be worked on in the group.
Let me know what you think.
Kind regards
JG
on the 01/05/04 13:23, Branko Collin wrote:
On 1 May 2004, at 11:02, J. Grant wrote:
I wonder if there is any way I can donate money towards
Another argument is that we would certainly not want to drop the
current user interface since it works well for a lot of people. So
I seriously doubt that any user would object against having WiW in the
preferences.
That's not my point. But adding WiW to the GIMP code will almost
certainly
Hi Sven,
IMHO, the plugins could be left un-bound to any window as they are atm.
Or is there a hard coded underlying attachment between the plugin and
parent windows required for it all to work?
Are you saying that plug-in dialogs should be handled differently than
core dialogs? If we want to
Hi Michael,
You might want to have a look at XNest, or the following GIMP plug-in if
you are working on Win32: http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=3892
I don't know if there is an equivalent for Mac OS X, though.
Thanks for the link. This is great, it's got a lot of what I was
interested in. If
