Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
> > >I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the C-S-Z.
> > sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse things if a user
> > wants to apply SH+CT+Z to some other funct
* Tom Mraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030928 15:59]:
> Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
> >
> >>>I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the
> >>>C-S-Z.
> >>
> >>sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse
Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the C-S-Z.
sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse things if a user
wants to apply SH+CT+Z to some other function(not sure w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-26 at 1933.11 +):
> >I'd suggest to leave the C-R as default keybinding and hardcode the C-S-Z.
> sounds like a good option, of course, it would confuse things if a user
> wants to apply SH+CT+Z to some other function(not sure why they'd want to,
> but it's possibl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-09-25 at 2008.02 +0200):
> You have a point here. I think that what was chosen was the
> consistency of Shift as negation. I think that's probably a goal
Relation, not just plain negation. So that is why using shift for
grouping would be fine.
> we could work towards. It c
