Hi,
00a...@gmail.com (2009-03-13 at 2306.16 +1030):
> > Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this?
> > Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
> No and no respectively, IMO.
> Don't need full image-hose functionality for this; however IMO at
> leas
On Friday 13 March 2009 14:02:04 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
> > Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is
> > no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes
> > and as such should remain to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gowers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> How useful are brush pipes (or image hoses) really? As far as I can see
>> their primary use is for simulating brush transformations. We can
>> already do that better on the f
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we need the full complexity of the current image hoses for this?
> Looks like a simple linear series of brushes could be sufficient.
No and no respectively, IMO.
Don't need full image-hose functionality for this; however IM
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 13:34 +0200, Alexia Death wrote:
> Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopefully is
> no longer needed. They are useful ho ever for complex animated brushes
> and as such should remain to be supported. I myself have made for
> example a hose brush th
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
>
>> I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want
>> GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would
>> require 2 things:
>> a) sup
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> How useful are brush pipes (or image hoses) really? As far as I can see
> their primary use is for simulating brush transformations. We can
> already do that better on the fly.
Use of image hose for brush transformation is abuse that hopef
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
> I think we would have to. At least, in my vision, where we want
> GIH/GBR to be eventually deprecated in preference of SVG. This would
> require 2 things:
> a) support multiple brushes in a SVG brush file, ala GIH (presumably
> a group
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:22 +0530, sumith pandilwar wrote:
>> by adding support for svg files i would like to add the feature to
>> import svg file and modify its properties like colour, fade out etc
>> and use it like a brush
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:22 +0530, sumith pandilwar wrote:
> by adding support for svg files i would like to add the feature to
> import svg file and modify its properties like colour, fade out etc
> and use it like a brush.This would be like totally creating a new
> brush of our own
OK, let'
10 matches
Mail list logo
