Re: [Gimp-developer] The Export spec should be augmented to handle an important usecase

2009-07-25 Thread peter sikking
Omari Stephens wrote: UI powers that be: any ideas/status on this? having thought about it quite a bit, here are some jots: as Omari pointed out himself, it is a tug of war of different use cases and it depends on what just happens to be worked on, what the right default is for any given

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Export spec should be augmented to handle an important usecase

2009-07-25 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 15:22 +0200, peter sikking wrote: [...] but it is impossible/the hack of the month to put widgets in a gtk file dialog I was told. and I do not think it is worth it, the hack of the month. It's only software... gtk+ could be changed, no? -- Liam Quin - XML Activity

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Export spec should be augmented to handle an important usecase

2009-07-21 Thread Omari Stephens
UI powers that be: any ideas/status on this? --xsdg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] The Export spec should be augmented to handle an important usecase

2009-07-08 Thread Omari Stephens
The spec is here: http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification#exporting_files Quick version: The default export path needs a settings switch for whether the original file path (number 3) is higher-priority than the most-recently-used paths (numbers 1 and 2). This would support

Re: [Gimp-developer] The Export spec should be augmented to handle an important usecase

2009-07-08 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Mittwoch, 8. Juli 2009 schrub Omari Stephens: [...] Thus, it seems like both ways of handling this default ([1, 2, 3] priority as well as [3, 1, 2] priority) are viable and useful. This is why I suggest having a setting to switch between the behaviors. What about providing some kind of