Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-19 Thread David Marrs
Alpár Jüttner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 20:52 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in >>> C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, >>> and test it? >> What about

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-19 Thread Simon Budig
Alpár Jüttner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 20:52 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote: > > > I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in > > > C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, > > > and test it

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-19 Thread Alpár Jüttner
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 20:52 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in > > C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, > > and test it? > > What about downloading it and ch

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-14 Thread William Skaggs
From: Federico Alcantara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in >C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, >and test it? You can find a brief overview at http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/SummerOfCode and a lot more detailed information at http://developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-14 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Federico Alcantara writes: > I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in C/C++, There is no programming language called C/C++. GIMP is written in C. It can be scripted in Scheme (a dialect of Lisp), and the usual suspects Perl and Python. > and which tools are needed to compile, debug,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-14 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote: > Hi > > I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in > C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, > and test it? What about downloading it and checking yourself? ciao, --mitch __

[Gimp-developer] Tools

2007-03-14 Thread Federico Alcantara
Hi I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug, and test it? Federico Alcantara Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & D

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-17 Thread Lourens Veen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 17 January 2002 17:44, Dave Neary wrote: > > Please, please, please try to get this right. When discussing GIMP, it > > is NEVER Gimp. It is NEVER plugin. GIMP has plug-ins. > > Surely The GIMP (or the GIMP) has plug-ins? :-) Must be T

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-17 Thread Dave Neary
> Please, please, please try to get this right. When discussing GIMP, it > is NEVER Gimp. It is NEVER plugin. GIMP has plug-ins. Surely The GIMP (or the GIMP) has plug-ins? :-) Dave Neary (hello all from AZERTY land) ___ Gimp-developer mailing li

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Chris Brown
On 15 Jan 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > if I'm informed correctly someone is already working on a plug-in manager > but I'd like him to speak up here on himself. I said I would be interested working on something like that but I probably don't have the skills or knowledge of GIMP to do it all myse

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Lourens Veen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 15 January 2002 21:14, you wrote: > Hi, > > I said "with the current design". A plug-in manager should definitely > be designed to also work for pluggable tools (Bex, how would I spell > this correctly?) which is something we definitely wa

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > at least with the current design there is tremendous difference: a tool > > is just a function in the gimp core while a plug-in is a separate process. > > A tool can do just everything, a plug-in is limited to the libgimp API. > > Ah, right. So d

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Lourens Veen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 15 January 2002 20:39, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > if I'm informed correctly someone is already working on a plug-in manager > but I'd like him to speak up here on himself. If you're reading this, yes, please do so. That'll save me anot

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With people talking on this list about plugin distribution and management > again recently, I figured it'd be nice to have some document which is worked > out a bit more than the ideas that have been thrown up so far. So I've > started to make su

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Rebecca J. Walter
Please, please, please try to get this right. When discussing GIMP, it is NEVER Gimp. It is NEVER plugin. GIMP has plug-ins. Thank you. the resident proofreading compulsive, bex ps--this rant is addressed at everyone who does it wrong, not just the author of this post. On Tue, 2002-01-15 a

[Gimp-developer] Tools vs. Plugins

2002-01-15 Thread Lourens Veen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, With people talking on this list about plugin distribution and management again recently, I figured it'd be nice to have some document which is worked out a bit more than the ideas that have been thrown up so far. So I've started to make s