On Thursday 17 January 2008 14:45, William Skaggs wrote:
From: peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chiming in here (getting back to speed). [...]
Peter! Great to hear from you again!
I absolutely agree about the virtues of a tagging system, but
I fear that the difficulties are not being
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 17:42, William Skaggs wrote:
This mixes together two separate issues. Tags are, as I have
already agreed, an excellent way of doing a search mechanism. They
don't get rid of the need to have a workspace, though. Suppose I
want to switch back and forth between
From: Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about using...tags... for that? [etc]
These are interesting ideas, but they are fantasies at this point.
The whole tags thing is a fantasy at this point. There is no
infrastructure in Gimp to support it, so everything would have
to be written from
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:50:36 +0100, William Skaggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, to repeat, even if there is tags support, there must be,
at least from the user's point of view, something like a workspace --
a set of brushes that are immediately available. The proposal
I made -- simply
