I must be tired, I can't figure out a way to verify this, but I assume
this is a correct fix for a real problem? Unless somebody opposes,
I'll commit this.
Piet van Oostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found another case where the lighting plug-in doesn't initialize
variables in non-interactive
Greetings Gimp developers,
I just finished building instlling gimp-1.1.24 on 4 platforms for
our users here. I had some difficulties related to the gettext
package.
The 4 platforms are:
alphaev56-dec-osf4.0e
i686-pc-linux-gnu
mips-sgi-irix6.5
I am trying to develop a script for scaling images and I cant seem to
find out how to get the size (pixels x and y) of the image once I load
it.
my $img2 = Gimp-file_load($file,$file);
How do I get the height and width of this image??
Thanks in advance.
--
Christopher R. Moewes-Bystrom
Hi,
I wanted to clean up the command line options a little (to make gimp
even more perfect:) and so i made some changes to not just the
formatting, but also the options themselves. I just wanted to see what
other people think of this, and if the -v - -V change will affect
anyone adversely.
Hi,
I forgot to say what changes i'd made (d'oh!). Here's a list:
* Add "-c" as synonym for "--console-messages"
* Add "-d" as synonym for "--no-data"
* Add "-n" as synonym for "--no-interface"
* Add "-s" as synonym for "--no-splash"
* Add "-S" as synonym for "--no-splash-image"
* Add
In regard to: Re: problems building 1.1.24 (gettext), David Starks-Browning...:
On Monday 21 Aug 00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my case, this forces -lintl for Linux and Solaris too, but that
didn't seem to cause any harm. (At least not yet...) It was
sufficient to get gimp built on
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 10:50:34AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to develop a script for scaling images and I cant seem to
find out how to get the size (pixels x and y) of the image once I load
it.
my $img2 = Gimp-file_load($file,$file);
How do I get the height and
Piers Cornwell wrote:
Hi,
snipped...
* Add "-v" as synonym for "--verbose"
* Remove "-v" as synonyn for "--version"
* Add "-V" as synonym for "--version"
I'd keep -v = --version and add -V = --verbose.
This, out of respect for backward compatibility for
any version checking automata.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2000-08-21 at 1913.32 -0400):
* Add "-v" as synonym for "--verbose"
* Remove "-v" as synonyn for "--version"
* Add "-V" as synonym for "--version"
I'd keep -v = --version and add -V = --verbose.
This, out of respect for backward compatibility for
any version checking
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 07:13:32PM -0400, Garry R. Osgood wrote:
I'd keep -v = --version and add -V = --verbose.
This, out of respect for backward compatibility for
any version checking automata.
But then, most other GNU programs use -V for --version and -v for --verbose,
right? I completely
Steinar H. Gunderson said...
|
|But then, most other GNU programs use -V for --version and -v for --verbose,
|right? I completely agree that we should strive not to break anything, but the
|question is what (if anything) we'll break, vs. the need for consistency.
I almost did this when I
11 matches
Mail list logo
