Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

The point of the intro is not to advise them of ALL their rights in one paragraph. That's what the GNU license page is for, and also the FOSS link. Those are complete references to all their rights under the GPL, and they are included as links in this intro. So filling in the gaps with quick

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

I have also changed the spelling of licence to license since that's how it is all over the gnu website. lol Guess the Americans win this round. ;) On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:40 PM, C R wrote: > I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in big > bold

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 20:15 +0200, Nikola M escribió: > On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote: > > I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source > > code. > > I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since > > you > > are obligued to make the source code available

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 21:23 -0300, Gez escribió: > It has NOTHING to do with the license. The license for GPL licensed > work is and will be always GPL unless you're the only person who > wrote > the original code and therefor you keep the right of re-licensing it > to > whatever license you

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On 09/18/2015 11:52 AM, Nikolam wrote: > On 9/17/15, srikanth wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> Thank You very Much for the information. > > Of course GPL license is about source code and Binaries can have > another license, No. -- Regards, Michael GPG:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote: I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code. I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you are obligued to make the source code available when you distribute the binaries. Source code is covered and source

Re: [Gimp-developer] Crash with Print simulation

On 09/18/2015 01:59 PM, Gez wrote: El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 13:56 -0400, Elle Stone escribió: Hmm, hopefully it was implied by the post topic, but in "Edit/Preferences/Color Management" pick "Print simulation" as the "Mode of operation". Yes, it was clear. But now that you mention it, does

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

18 сент. 2015 г. 21:15 пользователь "Nikola M" написал: > > On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote: >> >> I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code. >> I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you >> are obligued to make the source code available when

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On 09/18/2015 08:15 PM, Nikola M wrote: > On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote: >> I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code. >> I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you >> are obligued to make the source code available when you distribute the >>

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in big bold letters in the about information for GIMP. I have no basis for judging whether that's necessary or not, other than someone thought it was worth shouting digitally about. :) -C On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Gez

Re: [Gimp-developer] Crash with Print simulation

El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 13:56 -0400, Elle Stone escribió: > Hmm, hopefully it was implied by the post topic, but in > "Edit/Preferences/Color Management" pick "Print simulation" as the > "Mode > of operation". Yes, it was clear. But now that you mention it, does the "color proof" display

[Gimp-developer] Python Interpreter on Windows

I am little puzzled with how the Python interpreter is well interpreted with GIMP. For instance, when I build GIMP from git, it's all good and the interpreter I specify in pygimp.interp works fine. Now I create an installer from my build and install it in Program Files for example (location very

Re: [Gimp-developer] Crash with Print simulation

On 09/18/2015 12:01 PM, Elle Stone wrote: The Color Management Preferences combination that sometimes causes a crash seems to be: 1. Open or make a floating point sRGB image with out of gamut RGB values. As an aside, out of gamut RGB values generate screenfuls of terminal messages like

Re: [Gimp-developer] Crash with Print simulation

The crash with Print simulation might be related to LCMS 2.8 from git. I can trigger a crash with LCMS 2.8 from git installed, and so far haven't managed to trigger a crash with LCMS 2.7 or 2.6 installed. The slowness is another issue, but that also is triggered somewhat sporadically.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where binaries are licensed as company that is distributing binaries seems fit.But source is available that other users can make binaries if they use their own bending (CentOS, Fedora). Not to mention forks like LibreOffice from OpenOffice etc. or

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

Dear All, Thank You very Much for the information. Thanks & Regard’s Srikanth Kavarthapu Executive IT Kobelco Cranes India (P) Ltd. www. kobelco-cranes.com/India P Before printing this email or any attachments, think about your responsibility

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On 9/17/15, srikanth wrote: > Dear All, > > > > Thank You very Much for the information. Of course GPL license is about source code and Binaries can have another license, In this case, binaries are also leaved freely to use and distribute. This are my

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On 09/18/2015 04:33 PM, C R wrote: > I'd patch the new website code thusly: > http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/about/ > > My thought is the majority of people coming to the site are not going to be > interested in altering the code, but rather using it. > Thoughts? Please check that your text

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

Does not contradict. It however, does not mention the four freedoms verbatim however (neither did the previous text that was there). Maybe it should? On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote: > > > On 09/18/2015 04:33 PM, C R wrote: > > I'd patch the new

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

I have added a hyperlink to "Free and Open Source Software", that links to https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html My thought is the gnu.org page explains the freedoms of all open source software well enough. I've only filled in the direct implications of the four freedoms for GIMP software

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

I'd patch the new website code thusly: http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/about/ My thought is the majority of people coming to the site are not going to be interested in altering the code, but rather using it. When most users think of software licences for graphics programs, it generally has less

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, C R wrote: > Feel free to use my description on the website. Where would you like it to show up? Just in case, we already have a new FAQ on the new website, and it answers this question in layman's terms. Alex ___

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nikolam wrote: > Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where binaries are licensed as > company that is distributing binaries seems fit. Please name an example of GPL software binaries relicensed by Red Hat. > Not to mention forks like LibreOffice from

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

Feel free to use my description on the website. I can submit a patch for it also if that's desirable. On 18 Sep 2015 2:04 pm, "Alexandre Prokoudine" < alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nikolam wrote: > > Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 14:10 -0300, Gez escribió: > "The program itself is governed by the terms of the GNU General > Public > License (GPL) which ensures that users have freedom to use the > program > with any purpose, study and modify its source code and share > modifications to the

[Gimp-developer] WGO Redesign Update

Just a small update. I've been busy IRL, and haven't had a chance to work on some things these past weeks. I'll be ramping back up shortly. I incorporated some changes per Jakub from a couple of weeks ago (mostly the navigation header font and styling). I am still trying to sort out some font

[Gimp-developer] Crash with Print simulation

With current GIMP from git (last updated yesterday), "Preferences/Color Management/Print simulation" is sometimes very slow to refresh the screen, even with small (900x600px) images, and will sometimes crash GIMP. The last time I used GIMP 2.9's Print simulation was in April 2015, using LCMS

Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization

El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 16:03 +0100, C R escribió: > I have added a hyperlink to "Free and Open Source Software", that > links to > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html > > My thought is the gnu.org page explains the freedoms of all open > source > software well enough. I've only filled