On 09/18/15 09:34 PM, C R wrote:
It's odd and strange to walk into FOSS world form the
corporate one. I want to get these companies (and professional users) up
and going quickly with GIMP as fast and easily as possible,
It would be great for new users to know that they can actually, actively
cha
Code stays GPL, code gets released, but in practice, binaries can
include other glued blobs that are not GPL.(after compilation).
Examples are Oracle Solaris and RedHat, SuSE etc. where binaries are
available by user subscription/payment and binaries usage right are
clearly different then GPL fo
El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 21:23 -0300, Gez escribió:
> It has NOTHING to do with the license. The license for GPL licensed
> work is and will be always GPL unless you're the only person who
> wrote
> the original code and therefor you keep the right of re-licensing it
> to
> whatever license you wa
El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 20:15 +0200, Nikola M escribió:
> On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote:
> > I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source
> > code.
> > I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since
> > you
> > are obligued to make the source code available w
On 09/18/2015 08:15 PM, Nikola M wrote:
> On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote:
>> I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code.
>> I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you
>> are obligued to make the source code available when you distribute the
>>
18 сент. 2015 г. 21:15 пользователь "Nikola M" написал:
>
> On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code.
>> I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you
>> are obligued to make the source code available when you
The point of the intro is not to advise them of ALL their rights in one
paragraph. That's what the GNU license page is for, and also the FOSS link.
Those are complete references to all their rights under the GPL, and they
are included as links in this intro. So filling in the gaps with quick
inform
On 09/18/15 08:38 PM, C R wrote:
what they want to know (use case) is not covered by
the license in the first place.
It is not enough to just give them use case and a binary license.
They must be informed on their rights and have option to display also
source license.
It is requirement for d
I have also changed the spelling of licence to license since that's how it
is all over the gnu website. lol Guess the Americans win this round. ;)
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:40 PM, C R wrote:
> I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in big
> bold letters in the about in
I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in big
bold letters in the about information for GIMP. I have no basis for judging
whether that's necessary or not, other than someone thought it was worth
shouting digitally about. :)
-C
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Gez wrote
Licence is not misspelt. If you are outside of the States, that's how you
spell the noun form of "license".
http://grammarist.com/spelling/licence-license/
The revisions suggested does not answer whether the work done in GIMP is
yours, and does not mention that your work in GIMP is not even govern
On 09/18/15 07:10 PM, Gez wrote:
I wonder if saying that the only license pertains to the source code.
I'd say that the binaries are also covered by the license, since you
are obligued to make the source code available when you distribute the
binaries.
Source code is covered and source changes,
El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 14:10 -0300, Gez escribió:
> "The program itself is governed by the terms of the GNU General
> Public
> License (GPL) which ensures that users have freedom to use the
> program
> with any purpose, study and modify its source code and share
> modifications to the community.
El vie, 18-09-2015 a las 16:03 +0100, C R escribió:
> I have added a hyperlink to "Free and Open Source Software", that
> links to
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
>
> My thought is the gnu.org page explains the freedoms of all open
> source
> software well enough. I've only filled in
I have added a hyperlink to "Free and Open Source Software", that links to
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
My thought is the gnu.org page explains the freedoms of all open source
software well enough. I've only filled in the direct implications of the
four freedoms for GIMP software us
Does not contradict. It however, does not mention the four freedoms
verbatim however (neither did the previous text that was there).
Maybe it should?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2015 04:33 PM, C R wrote:
> > I'd patch the new website code thusly:
> >
On 09/18/2015 04:33 PM, C R wrote:
> I'd patch the new website code thusly:
> http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/about/
>
> My thought is the majority of people coming to the site are not going to be
> interested in altering the code, but rather using it.
> Thoughts?
Please check that your text
I'd patch the new website code thusly:
http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/about/
My thought is the majority of people coming to the site are not going to be
interested in altering the code, but rather using it.
When most users think of software licences for graphics programs, it
generally has less t
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, C R wrote:
> Feel free to use my description on the website.
Where would you like it to show up? Just in case, we already have a
new FAQ on the new website, and it answers this question in layman's
terms.
Alex
___
gimp-d
Feel free to use my description on the website. I can submit a patch for it
also if that's desirable.
On 18 Sep 2015 2:04 pm, "Alexandre Prokoudine" <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nikolam wrote:
> > Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where bina
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nikolam wrote:
> Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where binaries are licensed as
> company that is distributing binaries seems fit.
Please name an example of GPL software binaries relicensed by Red Hat.
> Not to mention forks like LibreOffice from OpenO
Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where binaries are licensed as
company that is distributing binaries seems fit.But source is available
that other users can make binaries if they use their own bending (CentOS,
Fedora).
Not to mention forks like LibreOffice from OpenOffice etc. or example
On 09/18/2015 11:52 AM, Nikolam wrote:
> On 9/17/15, srikanth wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank You very Much for the information.
>
> Of course GPL license is about source code and Binaries can have
> another license,
No.
--
Regards,
Michael
GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC
On 9/17/15, srikanth wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Thank You very Much for the information.
Of course GPL license is about source code and Binaries can have
another license,
In this case, binaries are also leaved freely to use and distribute.
This are my thoughts based on free software source licen
net.com
Cc: gimp-developer
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Reg:Usuage of the Gimp for my Organization
There is no license to use the software. The only license for the GIMP pertains
to the code it's self (altering it, etc). You are free to install and use the
GIMP on as many machines as yo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:12:03PM +0100, C R wrote:
> There is no license to use the software. The only license for the GIMP
> pertains to the code it's self (altering it, etc). You are free to install
> and use the GIMP on as many machines as you want, free of charge, for any
> purpose you like.
There is no license to use the software. The only license for the GIMP
pertains to the code it's self (altering it, etc). You are free to install
and use the GIMP on as many machines as you want, free of charge, for any
purpose you like. Please keep in mind that there is no warranty.
You retain all
Dear All,
I am Planning to install the GIMP software for the users in my Organization.
Now I want to know is there any special license required to use the
software. If so, please share all the details for the purchase of the
software.
Thanks & Regard's
Srikanth Kavarthapu
Executive IT
28 matches
Mail list logo