[Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Thierry Vignaud
hello, i'm the gimp maintainer in mandrake linux distribution. here're the patches i currently apply on gimp-1.2.3: explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export functions, which makes perl programmers became f

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hello, i'm the gimp maintainer in mandrake linux distribution. > > here're the patches i currently apply on gimp-1.2.3: > > explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave > strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules d

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave > > strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export > > functions, which makes perl programmers became fool ... > > I don't understand this patch nor the explanation yo

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > explaination note for a default that make perl programmers behave > > > strangely with gimp. by default, gimp perl modules doesn't export > > > functions, which makes perl programmers became fool ... > > > > I don't understand this patch nor

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi demad dit! > > one of my coworker tried one day to write perl stuff for gimp but > > got mad since he wasted two hours before understanding the doc was > > wrong since some stuff didn't got imported into namespace, which > > is what use is intended

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i can buy that even if my experience is that 90% of bugs tracked by > such system belong to: > - non bugs > - help request > - assigned to random modules > - doesn't provides any useful information beside "XYZ sucks", > sometimes with the usefu

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course well-done bug-reports make our life easier and the ones > you've submitted don't fall into this category. i love you too :-) i'm open to enhancements ... i must admit i send bug reports very seldom but gots several ones on each day the Big R

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] mandrake patches dump

2002-06-11 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i'm open to enhancements ... i've received some now, and i have to admit that coming back to the previous bug report in links is the best way to forget to change the title of the second one :-( -- "ca fait pas "homme" d'aller voir le medecin" (gc)

[Gimp-developer] Your message to Gimp-announce awaits moderator approval

2002-06-11 Thread gimp-announce-admin
Your mail to 'Gimp-announce' with the subject A good tool Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message body is too big: 123371 bytes but there's a limit of 40 KB Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will rec

[Gimp-developer] gimp security bug, shared memory

2002-06-11 Thread David Fries
Currently the shared memory region that gimp uses to communicate to and from plugins is readable and writable by every user on the system. This is not good. I don't know what data or control information gimp puts in this shared region, but someone could at least view or corrupt your working image