Hi,
As you may know the gfig plug-in was in bad shape, and I've been working
on it for a few weeks. Still, there are some issues. I've tried to make
a list (ordered by severity):
1 Major.
1.1 deleting an object, by using the delete tool or even undo mess up
the current_style variable an
David Odin wrote:
[...]
2 Normal.
2.1 The undo button should be moved to the toolbar.
2.2 The 'select object' tool seems useless, and might be removed.
2.3 Find out how the gradient fill is supposed to work (it is
unimplemented for now), or remove it from the filling choice.
[...]
All t
On 13.11.2004, at 08:48, Manish Singh wrote:
shm is a special case. I'm talking about allocating highmem
segments.
So, what is the userspace API for this?
AFAIK there's no direct userspace helper to address highmem
segments; one can only map them in the Linux kernel and
provide them to userspace (
On 13.11.2004, at 07:45, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
t's a whole bunch of contortions, and all pointless since amd64
hardware is competitively priced these days.
please dont concentrate only on those who can change pcs like shirts,
concentrate on us poor people too. ;)
Actually my focus is on havin
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:29:58PM +0100, Karine Proot wrote:
> David Odin wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >2 Normal.
> > 2.1 The undo button should be moved to the toolbar.
> > 2.2 The 'select object' tool seems useless, and might be removed.
> > 2.3 Find out how the gradient fill is supposed to work (it
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:41PM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
hi, i am really glad that you stuck with this list. since making this
excellent decision, might i direct you to this document:
http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html and ask that you at least strip the
mail
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:03:01PM +0100, Popolon wrote:
> fresh cvs gimp-gap dosn't compile anymore with gimp-2.0.
>
> I tried to compile it with fresh cvs (today cvs) That's OK, but it
> definitivly crash with unknown symbols, is there anything special to do,
> for using it?
>
i am compiling
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:13 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
Hi,
Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that
> the underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any
> favours. When binaries are available windows is the easiest
> platform to test on and in a way the instability of the
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:13:32PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that the
> underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any favours. When
> binaries are available windows is the easiest platform to test on and in a
> way the i
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:28:44 +0100
> From: David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]
>
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:13:32PM +00
Hi Alan,
Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote:
> > and as I already said before, using the 2.0 version of gfig would mean
> > to at least port the old version to the HIG standards,
>
> I was suggesting shipping the old unmodified version because it was more
> stable.
I ju
12 matches
Mail list logo
