[Gimp-developer] Things left to do with gfig.

2004-11-14 Thread David Odin
Hi, As you may know the gfig plug-in was in bad shape, and I've been working on it for a few weeks. Still, there are some issues. I've tried to make a list (ordered by severity): 1 Major. 1.1 deleting an object, by using the delete tool or even undo mess up the current_style variable

Re: [Gimp-developer] Things left to do with gfig.

2004-11-14 Thread Karine Proot
David Odin wrote: [...] 2 Normal. 2.1 The undo button should be moved to the toolbar. 2.2 The 'select object' tool seems useless, and might be removed. 2.3 Find out how the gradient fill is supposed to work (it is unimplemented for now), or remove it from the filling choice. [...] All

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparing gimp speed

2004-11-14 Thread Daniel Egger
On 13.11.2004, at 08:48, Manish Singh wrote: shm is a special case. I'm talking about allocating highmem segments. So, what is the userspace API for this? AFAIK there's no direct userspace helper to address highmem segments; one can only map them in the Linux kernel and provide them to userspace

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparing gimp speed

2004-11-14 Thread Daniel Egger
On 13.11.2004, at 07:45, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote: t's a whole bunch of contortions, and all pointless since amd64 hardware is competitively priced these days. please dont concentrate only on those who can change pcs like shirts, concentrate on us poor people too. ;) Actually my focus is on

Re: [Gimp-developer] Things left to do with gfig.

2004-11-14 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:29:58PM +0100, Karine Proot wrote: David Odin wrote: [...] 2 Normal. 2.1 The undo button should be moved to the toolbar. 2.2 The 'select object' tool seems useless, and might be removed. 2.3 Find out how the gradient fill is supposed to work (it is

Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection to brush/pattern/whatever in menus...

2004-11-14 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:41:41PM -0800, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote: Carol Spears wrote: hi, i am really glad that you stuck with this list. since making this excellent decision, might i direct you to this document: http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html and ask that you at least strip the mail

Re: [Gimp-developer] fresh cvs gimp-gap and cvs gimp-2.2 crash

2004-11-14 Thread Carol Spears
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:03:01PM +0100, Popolon wrote: fresh cvs gimp-gap dosn't compile anymore with gimp-2.0. I tried to compile it with fresh cvs (today cvs) That's OK, but it definitivly crash with unknown symbols, is there anything special to do, for using it? i am compiling this

new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:13 +0100 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was unable

Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that the underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any favours. When binaries are available windows is the easiest platform to test on and in a way the instability of the

Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:13:32PM +, Alan Horkan wrote: It might help you to understand my negativity when I explain that the underlying instability of windows doesn't do the gimp any favours. When binaries are available windows is the easiest platform to test on and in a way the

Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:28:44 +0100 From: David Odin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options] On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:13:32PM +, Alan

Re: new gfig [Re: [Gimp-developer] canvas background options]

2004-11-14 Thread David Neary
Hi Alan, Alan Horkan wrote: On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, David Odin wrote: and as I already said before, using the 2.0 version of gfig would mean to at least port the old version to the HIG standards, I was suggesting shipping the old unmodified version because it was more stable. I just