Many 3-rd side script-fu scripts, working in 2.3.12, refused to work in
2.3.14 on Windows. One of them even kills Gimp at program start.
Where can I read what has changed in script-fu specifications to adapt
scripts? Or has the API changed?
--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
Von: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 22:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363775
Sorry, but I am unable to follow your way of handling bug reports. If
there's now a new bug that deals with remaining issues in bug #167956,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:26 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many 3-rd side script-fu scripts, working in 2.3.12, refused to work in
2.3.14 on Windows. One of them even kills Gimp at program start.
Where can I read what has changed in script-fu specifications to adapt
On 1/26/07, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was pretty trivial but not obvious at first since gimp uses autotools
in a non-standard way.
Where exactly was the problem in using a different --prefix and
how does GIMP
Raphaël, could you please explain me (I'm new to scheme) in a few
words, why the global variables are poor style coding? From my POV, they
can only introduce memory consumption in common case (but not in the
case of GIMP script-fu) and maybe some redefinitions in a large program
(this
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:13 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Maybe we should retroactively change the NEWS file and add another
line to the 2.3.13 entry saying something like all variables in
script-fu should be declared before being used?
I don't think that the NEWS file is the right place
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:11 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Raphaël, could you please explain me (I'm new to scheme) in a few
words, why the global variables are poor style coding?
They are simply not allowed in Scheme.
From my POV, they
can only introduce memory
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 22:21 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
Okay, it sounds like the developers aren't willing to put back the
delay functionality that was removed from the screenshot plug-in.
So for those of us who need the delay and don't want to go back to
2.2, I've grabbed the old 2.2
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:11 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Raphaël, could you please explain me (I'm new to scheme) in a few
words, why the global variables are poor style coding?
They are simply not allowed in Scheme.
Ok, that is the reason.
From my POV,
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 09:40 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Is the namespace cleared after script has finished its execution? And
are there any scripts considered to run simultaneously?
The scripts are loaded when the Script-Fu extension is started. Of
course the namespace isn't
Sven Neumann wrote:
Is the namespace cleared after script has finished its execution? And
are there any scripts considered to run simultaneously?
The scripts are loaded when the Script-Fu extension is started. Of
course the namespace isn't cleared or you couldn't run the script again.
And
11 matches
Mail list logo
