On Feb 18, 2008 8:27 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 05:13 -0200, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'd would like to know why common tasks wouldn't fit there
>
> Yeah, I would also like to know that.
>
I thin peter explained i in one of the first
I only have time to write a quick note, so here we go:
Yes, focus on the 'yelling kid' to imagine what kind of interaction
avoid.
Our core users are people who know what they are doing.
They do not need 'help'. GIMP has to avoid trying to be
the boy scout helping the grandma across the busy stree
On Feb 17, 2008 5:07 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps for the rotation tool it doesn't mean much, but at least for
> the perspective tool it would be nice if one could undo the
> incremental changes one does to the control points. Probably this
> wouldn't be hard to implement
I have found posts related to this error in the forum, but nothing
really matches. I have also googled for a solution and found none.
The difficulty that I am having starts with this really simple python
script in a file called gimpTest.py:
from gimpfu import *
print "I am running the script"
gi
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:21 +0100, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
> You can see the problem very good, if you start Krita. Krita has such
> a yelling start dialog. But I'm not sure if not having common tasks in
> the start window is the solution or if we just have to design it more
> carefully than Kri
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 14:54 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> Our core users are people who know what they are doing.
> They do not need 'help'.
Yes, they do. This dialog is the first thing people see when starting
GIMP. And a large fraction of our users are beginners. So we have a good
chance h
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 21:02 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I don't think using "--batch -" works with python-fu-eval. It might make
> sense to add this as a special case just like it is being done for
> script-fu-eval now.
Please ignore what I said. python-fu-eval does special-case the "-"
com
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:05 -0800, Al Niessner wrote:
> I have found posts related to this error in the forum, but nothing
> really matches. I have also googled for a solution and found none.
>
> The difficulty that I am having starts with this really simple python
> script in a file called g
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:05 -0800, Al Niessner wrote:
> I expect the the line "I am running the script" to print and then GIMP
> to exit -- see http://www.gimp.org/docs/python/index.html for details on
> gimp.quit().
The documentation you are looking at is hopelessly outdated. gimp.quit()
ex
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 21:26 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > I expect the the line "I am running the script" to print and then GIMP
> > to exit -- see http://www.gimp.org/docs/python/index.html for details on
> > gimp.quit().
>
> The documentation you are looking at is hopelessly outdated. gim
Sorry about getting twice Sven, but I should keep it on the list for the
next person searching the archives.
Any suggestions or guesses on how to make the GIMP application exit?
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 21:26 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:05 -0800, Al Niessner wrote
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 13:27 -0800, Al Niessner wrote:
> Personally, pdb.gimp_quit(0) makes just as much sense as gimp.exit() as
> long as it noted somewhere.
All PDB procedures are documented in the Procedure Browser that you can
reach from the Xtns menu in the toolbox.
Sven
Dang! I tried pdb.gimp-quit() like in script-fu and it, of course, did
not work. I then browsed http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/index.html
looking for a quit or some type of control over gimp and did not see
anything.
It works. Thanks.
Personally, pdb.gimp_quit(0) makes just as much sense as g
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 10:05 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:
> > There are very good reasons why tear-off menus are deprecated. They
> > don't solve usability issues but introduce them.
>
> They're deprecated? It figures that something so useful would be.
Well, perhaps not deprecated in the "don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
