Re: [Gimp-developer] Intolerance, and development.

2002-12-01 Thread Michael J. Hammel
Thus spoke David Weeks
> My problem of recent days started with a reply to a requested feature: mng 
> support.  The response I got was that I had a lot of nerve asking someone 
> else to slave for me.  I got that from the same who's never even HEARD of 
> regular expressions, and is now an active partner in the development of gimp?  

GIMP isn't text processing, so it wouldn't be out of character to have
developers who don't know regex's.  I wouldn't expect them to know about
transaction processing and rollbacks (both DB terms) or pinning and ioctl's
(kernel terms) either.  It's nice when we do.  But it's not required.

> While this on going discussion is not a specific, tactical Q&A on code, it is 
> a specific discussion of what it is to work on that code, and the expectation 
> of that code's consumers:  the GNU/Linux/Open Source community, and end-users 
> the world over.  

The "GNU/Linux/Open Source community" is too vague to be considered a target
audience.  Kernel developers are not big users of the GIMP, for example.  The
target audience, in the most general terms (which really aren't very useful if
you're trying to make decisions on what to do next) are artists, be they part
of the open source community or not.

-- 
Michael J. Hammel   The Graphics Muse 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.graphics-muse.com
--
You're life can be a wonderous journey, if you don't spend all your time
trying to drag someone else through it with you.  -  Michael J. Hammel
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] Intolerance, and development.

2002-11-28 Thread David Neary
David Weeks wrote:
> Tolerance isn't the lack of criticism, and intolerance isn't the act of 
> criticism, and beyond that, some things are tolerable, and some things are 
> not.  So let's drop the "troll" "intolerant" "ignorant" crap and deal with 
> information.  These reactions are human nature, and responsible for the 
> strife in the world;  just look at this list.

Actually, your abusive behaviour's been responsible for the
strife on the list. People in general have been polite, even
offerring you an excuse to back out early (drunkenness) and get
back to business. But that wasn't good enough for you, so you
started another 2 threads (including this one). Please, drop it. 

> Free discusion of ideas means it's all good, even the bad and the ugly, cause 
> that bad and ugly might be the fact that we're wrong, and someone was rude in 
> pointing it out.

Actually, free discussion comes with some responsibility. A good
question to ask is "Would I write this e-mail to a work colleague
I'm going to meet beside the coffee machine?" - I don't think you
would have. Or if you had, you would have been a bit more
articulate :)

In brief, you're new to the list (your first mail was a couple of
weeks ago about MNG support - I looked), and should probably
avoid abusive behaviour for a while, unless you want to get a bad
name, and be ignored. 

> My problem of recent days started with a reply to a requested feature: mng 
> support.  The response I got was that I had a lot of nerve asking someone 
> else to slave for me.

That's inaccurate.

> So here's the challenge:  who thinks that not knowing what regular expressions 
> are, or thinking that a feature request is wrong, is an indication of knowing 
> what you're doing as an open source developer in the GNU/Linux community?

This is the GIMP community, not the GNU/Linux community. And
here, not knowing what a regex is is probably the norm. And open
source developers don't have to code on Unix.

Please, keep quiet for a while, for your own good. 

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
   David Neary,
Marseille, France
  E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



[Gimp-developer] Intolerance, and development.

2002-11-28 Thread David Weeks
Jeez,

Guys, perhaps it was wrong for me to do the French/American thing, but I was 
drawing on historical examples.  All the same, I'd not respect anyone who 
didn't respect their own country.  I LOVE America, as an American, and I have 
MAJOR problems with much of America, just the same.

Tolerance isn't the lack of criticism, and intolerance isn't the act of 
criticism, and beyond that, some things are tolerable, and some things are 
not.  So let's drop the "troll" "intolerant" "ignorant" crap and deal with 
information.  These reactions are human nature, and responsible for the 
strife in the world;  just look at this list.

Free discusion of ideas means it's all good, even the bad and the ugly, cause 
that bad and ugly might be the fact that we're wrong, and someone was rude in 
pointing it out.

My problem of recent days started with a reply to a requested feature: mng 
support.  The response I got was that I had a lot of nerve asking someone 
else to slave for me.  I got that from the same who's never even HEARD of 
regular expressions, and is now an active partner in the development of gimp?  
Red flag folks.  I also see a split between Film Gimp and gimp.  More flags 
of red.  And there the fact that very POWERFUL people don't like us.  We 
don't serve them, we undermind their economic rents.

So here's the challenge:  who thinks that not knowing what regular expressions 
are, or thinking that a feature request is wrong, is an indication of knowing 
what you're doing as an open source developer in the GNU/Linux community?

While this on going discussion is not a specific, tactical Q&A on code, it is 
a specific discussion of what it is to work on that code, and the expectation 
of that code's consumers:  the GNU/Linux/Open Source community, and end-users 
the world over.  I'm "chop chewing" because of what I've found in this 
CRITICAL application's development forum.

Teachers correct, some learn, some cheat, others blame.  Fact is, none of us 
matter -- except for the users of gimp.  If we care about them, then we're 
not so different after all.

David Weeks

PS -- my deference to the French, and to Microsoft.  America would be English, 
were it not for aid of France, and computers would be Apple, Unix or IBM, 
were it not for the aid of Microsoft.  Ask those of us who were there, when a 
"pop" of Unix ran $2500 a seat, and Microsoft could be had for $100.  I'm 
glad Richard Stallman, Linus Torvaldes(sp?), Vinton Cerf and company, and the 
internet community furthered the perfection of software technology.  The 
strongest contribution being Freedom.
-- 
You can call me at: 813-236-2009, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shop TampaPC.com!
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer