On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:48:44 +, "Austin Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On , 17 Feb 2002, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> > As any looked into how all this will work with different window
> > managers? What window managers grab what keys and can the window
> > managers easily be configured
On , 17 Feb 2002, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> As any looked into how all this will work with different window
> managers? What window managers grab what keys and can the window
> managers easily be configured to use alt if gimp isn't using it?
>
> It is important to check this since we will othe
On 2002-02-17 at 1219.46 +0100, Rebecca J. Walter typed this mail:
>
> Also we will need a howto on the web site about making the different
> window managers play nice with gimp.
>
I have two screenshots showing how to fix Sawfish to play nice with
GIMP. I stored them here:
http://carol.gimp.or
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Tino Schwarze wrote:
>In my opinion it is impossible to make sure that we do not collide with
>window manager shortcuts. They are far too different and far too
>configurable.
Right, by the way I think we should consider at least sawfish (default wm for
GNOME) and kwm (default
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:19:46PM +0100, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> As any looked into how all this will work with different window
> managers? What window managers grab what keys and can the window
> managers easily be configured to use alt if gimp isn't using it?
>
> It is important to c
As any looked into how all this will work with different window
managers? What window managers grab what keys and can the window
managers easily be configured to use alt if gimp isn't using it?
It is important to check this since we will otherwise end up with lots
of whiny users who can't figure
On Sunday 17 February 2002 00:18, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-02-16 at 0929.47 +0100):
> > Thirdly, we now have three different Transform options. I know that
> > Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot, but with
> > this you can't see the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-02-16 at 0929.47 +0100):
> Well done! I still have some comments though, see below.
Thanks, that is why I post. :]
> I think we need to think very hard about Plug-ins, Filters, Script-Fu, and
> Tools.
Another I forget: no more differences about script-fu, pygimp,
perl-f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-02-16 at 0659.48 +0100):
> >Zoom In + [Yes, changed, a bit more logical, no?]
> >Zoom Out-
> If you have an US keyboard you'll notice that while the minus "-" is
> immediatly accessible, the plus "+" is obtained by pressing Sh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-02-16 at 0939.22 +0100):
> Something I forget: note that by this definition, the Text Tool isn't a tool
> either, at least when using Dynamic Text, since the placement of the text
> depends only on the option in the dialog box. I think Text should be a tool,
> and, unles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-02-16 at 0006.34 +0100):
> This is the doc I have now. Any comments? Suggestions? Fixes?
I got some questions and suggestions on IRC, so to avoid forgetting
and repetitions, I self reply:
- /Layer is the same menu the will be used for MB3 in Layers
dialog. That way you
11 matches
Mail list logo
