On , 15 Jan 2002, Michael Natterer wrote:
> I stripped out the USE_LAPLACIAN part not because it was unused
> but because my impression was that it could not work:
>
> gimp-1-2/app/iscissors.c has the following piece of code:
>
> #ifdef USE_LAPLACIAN
> static gint laplacian [9] =
> {
> -1,
Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1.2.2 definitely has the USE_LAPLACIAN code in, but it is not enabled.
>
> The current developer head in CVS doesn't. I'm assuming that as part
> of porting iscissors.c to the new tool model someone (Mitch/Sven?)
> took the opportunity to strip out
1.2.2 definitely has the USE_LAPLACIAN code in, but it is not enabled.
The current developer head in CVS doesn't. I'm assuming that as part
of porting iscissors.c to the new tool model someone (Mitch/Sven?)
took the opportunity to strip out unused code. This is a perfectly
reasonable thing to d
Hi,
Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Waitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:08:28AM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> > > I did test-implement it. #define USE_LAPLACIAN and recompile to see
> > > if it makes much difference. I couldn't see a v
On Tuesday, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Waitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:08:28AM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> > I did test-implement it. #define USE_LAPLACIAN and recompile to see
> > if it makes much difference. I couldn't see a visual different, only
> > it was a bit slower.
> well, then
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:08:28AM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> I did test-implement it. #define USE_LAPLACIAN and recompile to see
> if it makes much difference. I couldn't see a visual different, only
> it was a bit slower.
well, then your implementation was not committed to cvs
> I haven'
On Tuesday, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Waitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> > I think I was the last person to substantially modify the iscissors
> > code. I read the paper you reference above, and indeed it was quite
> > helpful. However, note that their a
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:04:55PM -0800, Laramie Leavitt wrote:
> Portions of the 'live-wire' feature would be expensive, namely
> the freezing, edge learning, and automatic node generation.
what is the difference between 'freezing' and 'automatic node
generation' here? both belog to what the pap
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> I think I was the last person to substantially modify the iscissors
> code. I read the paper you reference above, and indeed it was quite
> helpful. However, note that their algorithm is substantially more
> computationally expen
orithm the freezing would also be difficult.
Laramie Leavitt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin
Donnelly
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Martin Waitz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] intelligent scissors
On Mond
On Monday, 14 Jan 2002, Martin Waitz wrote:
> anyone working at the iscissor tool at the moment?
>
> i would like to implement some of the features described in
> http://www.cs.orst.edu/~enm/publications/GMIP_98/seg_scissors.html
> as a work for an university course.
I think I was the last pers
hi,
anyone working at the iscissor tool at the moment?
i would like to implement some of the features described in
http://www.cs.orst.edu/~enm/publications/GMIP_98/seg_scissors.html
as a work for an university course.
i don't want to duplicate work, so please tell me if there
are patches pendin
12 matches
Mail list logo
