Hi,
> Well, why dont start to work with the visions? I see it's as a great
> idea.
That's what we are doing for one and a half year now.
Your mail pointing out where the vision is not yet implemented was
really completely unneeded. We are well aware that it's still a vision
and that a lot needs
About Gfig, my idea is it, make it a tool, not a filter. Agree to you.
On Feb 1, 2008 9:03 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 1:41 PM, Isaque Profeta wrote:
>
> > Improve GFig and paths to be a a minimal consistent vector solution to
> help
> > a drawing
>
> Impr
On Feb 1, 2008 1:41 PM, Isaque Profeta wrote:
> Improve GFig and paths to be a a minimal consistent vector solution to help
> a drawing
Improving GFig probably doesn't make sense at all. Beginning with the
fact that drawing of that kind should not be done in a separate
window. I believe bgo has a
Prduct vision:
- GIMP is Free Software;
- No problems about that;
- GIMP is a high-end photo manipulation application and supports
creating original art from images;
- Critical points:
- Make a native support to up to 32 bit image (CMYK,
HDRI...);
-
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:29 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
> So, what is the product vision?
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/GIMP_UI_Redesign#product_vision
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:29 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
> One more question regarding the list (I know it's not a roadmap but still):
> Will
> a move to pure SDI help to get all the various dialogs to float properly above
> the image windows, never be lost behind them, and not have their
Sven Neumann gimp.org> writes:
> I think you misunderstood Peter's talk. These are the top 10 user
> requests, not the top priorities. It is very important to analysize user
> requests but it would be wrong to use this list as the basis for a
> discussion about the future roadmap. This should ha
From: peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> right on.
>
> top-10 (as felt by the developers) user requests of the last years.
>
> and at the lgm we addressed them as well as we could at that
> time (printing? what can we say about printing? OK, a couple of
> things...)
Okay, that's fine. So what,
Sven wrote:
> I think you misunderstood Peter's talk. These are the top 10 user
> requests, not the top priorities. It is very important to analysize
> user
> requests but it would be wrong to use this list as the basis for a
> discussion about the future roadmap. This should happen based on the
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 22:22 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> As I wrote earlier, Peter in his LGM talk listed the things he
> considered the top priorities at the UI level:
>
> 10. better printing support
> 9. painting with brushes
> 8. improve the text tool
> 7. save for web
> 6. organize
On Jan 27, 2008 8:52 AM, William Skaggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the points that emerged from the ongoing discussion is that it
> is time to start making a tentative roadmap for 2.8. I hope this time
> that Peter and his group can be brought into the discussion as early
> as possible, a
From: Robert Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 10. better printing support
>
> What are the specific printing issues under discussion?
Sorry, I should have repeated the reference I gave earlier. A summary
of Peter and Kamila's LGM talk is available from his web site, at
http://www.mmiworks.net/eng/p
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:22:17 GMT
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One of the points that emerged from the ongoing discussion is that it
is time to start making a tentative roadmap for 2.8. I hope this time
that Peter and his group can be brought into the discussion as
One of the points that emerged from the ongoing discussion is that it
is time to start making a tentative roadmap for 2.8. I hope this time
that Peter and his group can be brought into the discussion as early
as possible, and will play a role in shaping the plan.
As I wrote earlier, Peter in his
14 matches
Mail list logo
