Mark Lowry skrev:
Attached is a link to a screen capture showing the
same image opened in Windows Picture and Fax
viewer
and in GIMP 2.4. As you can see, the GIMP version
(no
editing performed) has a haze compared to the WPF
viewer version.
The reason I asked is that my goal when
post-processing is to end up with a print that looks
like my screen. When I print from Windows Picture
Fax Viewer, it looks like what I see on the screen. I
assumed that printing from GIMP would give you a print
that looked like the image that is open in
Mark Lowry vabijou at yahoo.com writes:
Two questions:
1. Shouldn't Try to use be unchecked by default
at installation? This would prevent some confusion,
at least it would have for me.
GIMP aims to be a respectable high-end graphic editor and as such should
support color management
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 15:15 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
GIMP aims to be a respectable high-end graphic editor and as such should
support color management by default. The problem you encountered is the same
problem many first-time users of Photoshop encounter. Actually, Photoshop
users
On Sunday 06 January 2008 11:52:49 Mark Lowry wrote:
The reason I asked is that my goal when
post-processing is to end up with a print that looks
like my screen.
This is one goal that users should be able to achieve. But I would take it
even farther by saying I want what is on my screen to
Mark Lowry skrev:
Attached is a link to a screen capture showing the
same image opened in Windows Picture and Fax viewer
and in GIMP 2.4. As you can see, the GIMP version (no
editing performed) has a haze compared to the WPF
viewer version.
