On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:51:53PM +0200, Vegard Vesterheim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no separate gimp-perl package. At the moment it looks a lot as if
> > gimp-1.4 will not have gimp-perl support.
>
> separate package from gimp itself, and that the packaging is using the
> ordinary Perl me
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the main reason is that AFAIK gtk+-perl hasn't been ported to
> GTK+-2.0 yet.
there've been a few port trials but none get completed.
but it'll be ported.
we (mandrake developers) use it for our installer (drakx) and our
config tools (drakxtools) use
Hi,
Vegard Vesterheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > no, the case for gimp-1.3 is that it ships w/o gimp-perl and there's
> > no separate gimp-perl package. At the moment it looks a lot as if
> > gimp-1.4 will not have gimp-perl support.
>
> Ouch, I would consider this to be *very* unfortunate
On 09 Oct 2002 13:45:00 +0200 Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > An alternative would
> > > be to distribute gimp-perl separately. In that case, I wouldn't care
> > > how it is built or packaged.
> > >
> >
> > Isn't it already the
Hi,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > An alternative would
> > be to distribute gimp-perl separately. In that case, I wouldn't care
> > how it is built or packaged.
> >
>
> Isn't it already the case for Gimp 1.3.x?
no, the case for gimp-1.3 is that it ships w/o gimp-perl and there's
On 8 Oct 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The reason I asked was because I had to pull a similar stunt for a game
> > I'm working on ( "I, Bex!"). What I eventually did was override the
> > distdir target in Makefile.PL:
>
> actuallyI'd prefer to g
Hi,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I asked was because I had to pull a similar stunt for a game
> I'm working on ( "I, Bex!"). What I eventually did was override the
> distdir target in Makefile.PL:
actually I'd prefer to get rid of Makefile.pl and build gimp-perl
using au
On 6 Oct 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Apparently, "make dist" does not include the files under the
> > plug-ins/perl directory (except for the po files). (I'm talking
> > about gimp 1.2.3).
>
> no, unfortunately the gimp-perl build is pretty ha
Hi,
Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apparently, "make dist" does not include the files under the
> plug-ins/perl directory (except for the po files). (I'm talking
> about gimp 1.2.3).
no, unfortunately the gimp-perl build is pretty hackish and
non-standard. The fact that 'make dist' d
