Ok, here are my 2¢...
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Besides, yes, gimp would need some kind of scanning through resource
> folders, and possibly group all resopurces tehre under an "all" flag.
> That is needed so that one can download resources and add then to
> GIMP throu
On Thursday 17 January 2008 14:45, William Skaggs wrote:
> From: peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > chiming in here (getting back to speed). [...]
>
> Peter! Great to hear from you again!
>
> I absolutely agree about the virtues of a tagging system, but
> I fear that the difficulties are not be
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:50:36 +0100, William Skaggs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, to repeat, even if there is tags support, there must be,
> at least from the user's point of view, something like a workspace --
> a set of brushes that are immediately available. The proposal
> I made -- simpl
From: Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What about using...tags... for that? [etc]
These are interesting ideas, but they are fantasies at this point.
The whole tags thing is a fantasy at this point. There is no
infrastructure in Gimp to support it, so everything would have
to be written from
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 17:42, William Skaggs wrote:
> This mixes together two separate issues. Tags are, as I have
> already agreed, an excellent way of doing a search mechanism. They
> don't get rid of the need to have a workspace, though. Suppose I
> want to switch back and forth between
