On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 03:06:26AM +0100, Nick Lamb wanted to say the following:
> NB None of this affects loading images, and you should NOT be
> creating more TIFFs, so hopefully right thinking people are quite
> unaffected apart from this build problem.
Eek. TIFF is very much alive in the pri
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 11:26:25PM +0300, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 03:06:26AM +0100, Nick Lamb wanted to say the following:
>> NB None of this affects loading images, and you should NOT be
>> creating more TIFFs, so hopefully right thinking people are quite
>> unaffected
Thus spoke Tuomas Kuosmanen
> On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 03:06:26AM +0100, Nick Lamb wanted to say the following:
> > NB None of this affects loading images, and you should NOT be
> > creating more TIFFs, so hopefully right thinking people are quite
> > unaffected apart from this build problem.
>
>
> Eek. TIFF is very much alive in the print media world..! Just declaring it
> sucky is not going to help a lot :|
You don't have to declare it sucky. It is sucky by itself :-)
> I also heard TIFF is the only format you can supply with a "clipping path"
> from photoshop that a DTP package
>It shouldn't be hard to stick an SVG path in a PNG extension chunk.
>If enough apps use it, it will become a standard.
And if you change the DTP guys minds, IMHO. From my experiences, it is hard.
I have shown PNG, talked about compression, and more things, but some guys
still do not get it, they
