Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Raphael Quinet
d to read that twice to understand what he was trying to to. Why does he duplicate the background layer and then delete the original immediately afterwards? Well, the reason is simple: this is the easiest and fastest way to add an alpha channel to the background layer. If you haven't assigned a sho

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Carey Bunks
[about not making background special wrt alpha] What do you think? YES please. this is simply annoying. I would even go as far as removing the "Add Alpha Channel" option from the menus, and suggest that the prefered method to add transparency to an imag

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread David Necas
... It should be easy add an alpha channel to the background layer as soon as a second layer is added to the image. Is there a reason why this should not be done automatically? I think that it would make things easier to understand for the user. Making the background layer "sp

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Jon Winters
On Tue, 16 May 2000, David Necas wrote: Making the background layer "special" is not very intuitive. ... What do you think? NO, please. snip The only good solution is probably to make `Add Alpha Channel' more intuitive. The user should _see_ the background layer

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Jens Lautenbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes: I would even go as far as removing the "Add Alpha Channel" option from the menus, and suggest that the prefered method to add transparency to an image that has only

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Alan
May I make a humble suggestion. Change File-New to allow users to select a Fill Type of either Background w/o alpha Background w/ alpha Then users can select what they want to begin with. Flatten and Add Alpha Channel can still exist as is in the Layers menu. No automatic behind-the-scenes

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes: On Tue, 16 May 2000, Jens Lautenbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would say, simply make a layer by default have alpha always... I know I know it's more memory for that 0.001 % of cases where people start with one background layer and stick to

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Raphael Quinet
L PROTECTED] wrote: May I make a humble suggestion. Change File-New to allow users to select a Fill Type of either Background w/o alpha Background w/ alpha Then users can select what they want to begin with. Flatten and Add Alpha Channel can still exist as is in the Layers menu. No automatic

Re: Is Add alpha channel really necessary?

2000-05-16 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 05:42:54PM +0200, David Necas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NO, please. `Special' background layer maybe isn't very intuitive, but automatical promoting has the same problem: it's based on a side-effect and it's not gimp automatically promotes layers on a variety of