On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 01:55:52PM +0200, Mickael Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, i'm new in this mailing list, and speaking with a friend of mine last
> week end, i'm think about making a plug-in for gimp dealing with splitting an
> image into several images, for web site (for exampl
Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> The Guillotine plug-in does image-splitting already and perl-o-tine enhances
> this functionality by writing the html-table to put the images back together.
> Is that what you are looking for?
Lots to learn. I'll need to try Guillotine and perl-o-tine. In the past
I have
Hi,
> Hello, i'm new in this mailing list, and speaking with a friend of mine last
> week end, i'm think about making a plug-in for gimp dealing with splitting an
> image into several images, for web site (for example) like this:
>
> source image:
>
>
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Jay Cox wrote:
> Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> Actually the first thing this plugin does is copy the pixel data into it's own
> process so there is no extra data thrashing going on (though it may be able to
> benefit from a call to gimp_tile_cache_ntiles). Copying all the pixel
Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:40:02 +1100 (EST), Paul F Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >I have made a plug-in that does some interesting things, like applying
> >a theme taken from one image and applying it to another, or making an
> >image tilable. More details at
>
Hi there,
> >>A question about patents. Is putting something on the web enough to
> >>prevent someone patenting it, or could someone download my plug-in and
> >>then patent the algorithm?
(I don't have the original mail anymore...)
> The best thing I can think of is to have a copy of the source c
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:40:02 +1100 (EST), Paul F Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have made a plug-in that does some interesting things, like applying
>a theme taken from one image and applying it to another, or making an
>image tilable. More details at
>http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~pfh/fix
On Fri, 07 Jan 2000 17:03:59 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillermo S. Romero / Familia
Romero) said:
>>A question about patents. Is putting something on the web enough to
>>prevent someone patenting it, or could someone download my plug-in and
>>then patent the algorithm?
>Your plugin is prior ar
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 11:16:54 -0500 (EST), Glyph Lefkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>IANAL either, but the "quick and dirty" solution to this is just to print
>out the code to your plugin, stick it in an envelope, and mail it to
>yourself.
This is archaic advice, and virtually useless. All doin
IANAL either, but the "quick and dirty" solution to this is just to print
out the code to your plugin, stick it in an envelope, and mail it to
yourself.
USPS is recognized by the US courts as valid, so a postmarked, sealed
envelope is pretty much incontrivertable proof that you were there when
y
>A question about patents. Is putting something on the web enough to
>prevent someone patenting it, or could someone download my plug-in and
>then patent the algorithm?
Your plugin is prior art so patents can not be taken. But web is still a
weird place, so you will have to convice lawyers that i
11 matches
Mail list logo
