On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the
> current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel
> domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK.
>
> On the other hand, we also have uk (which
Hi,
> I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the
> current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel
> domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK.
>
> On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not
> for ukraine), however, th
On 21 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the
> current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a
> toplevel domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK.
> On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but
> not
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow?
[Sleepy misunderstanding deleted]
Just in case anyone else is as tired as Marc was when he wrote that,
we're using the same convention as everyone else in gettext-land,
ba
I have a question: what standard do the po-filenames follow? In the
current gimp, we have a en_GB translation, however, GB is not a toplevel
domain, but the iso-3166 code for the UK.
On the other hand, we also have uk (which is a toplevel domain, but not
for ukraine), however, the iso-3166 code f
