On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:15:54AM +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:18:26PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> > I think some organization to get it going is indeed necessary - and
> > this one - "two weeks for updating translation" is certainly better than
> > none.
> >
> >
I think the translation work of the Gimp is already bureaucratized.
In W3C, each translator translates what he wants (a chapter, a section, etc.
). The translator receives merits and demerits by the text translated. It
needs to be more responsible in this way.
A link would have on the list of trans
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 06:24:44PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> Sorry if I sound a little bit a bureaucrat but I want to propose a rule
> for the version releases, similar to the string freeze for the programs.
>
> Sometimes the manual reach a state the could be safely published. When
> we decide
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:49:27PM +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 06:32:20PM +0200, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> > > 1) please update the .pot file and describe how to do it ...
> > > 2) ... possibly via make update-po
Den 14.06.2012 21:09, skreiv Ulf-D. Ehlert:
[...]
I have pushed my changes. After
./autogen.sh ...
or
automake # this should update quickreference/Makefile.in
./configure ... # this should update quickreference/Makefile
you should be able to update pot and po files in q
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Kolbjørn Stuestøl wrote:
> Well done Ulf.
Many, many thanks Ulf.
--
Marco Ciampa
++
| Linux User #78271 |
| FSFE fellow #364 |
++
___
gimp-docs-list mailing list
gi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:05:38AM -0300, Willer Gomes Junior wrote:
> I think the translation work of the Gimp is already bureaucratized.
[..]
No offence please but, I think you totally missed the point here.
The GIMP manual is not only a text, is part of an application.
To make it work, you hav
Hi Marco,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:18:19PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 07:22:17PM +1000, Roman Joost wrote:
> Yes but something is wrong even in 2.6 too.
>
> See:
>
> http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/
> or
> http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/it/
>
I manually build the last 2.6 rele
